| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Posted on 04/04/2002 10:05:32 AM PST by Heartlander
Evolution/morphing...the hairy-holy grail of buffoons--loons--loonatics!
liberals have no idea what science--truth--reality is.
They have an aversion to it.
Evolution is a liberal disease!
My, my. I seem to recall a certain someone posting a list of supposed insults I had made (turns out they weren't insults when taken in context, but that's another story).
As long as it wasn't used by Hillary, I'll survive.
Ignorance.
No, it is not. The article at the top is a disproof of evolution. It shows quite well that species are adaptable. That they adapt to changes of the environment but do not change their nature. Evolution says that species transform themselves into other species, other completely new organisms. This has never been observed. And no, the phony science of paleontology does not give any proof of evolution either.
My statement was denies God as a caretaker and it certainly does. It denies God the Creator of life, God the Creator of man. It denies that God had anything to do with the creation of life on Earth. It denies any role for God in the scheme of things. So yes, it definitely denies God as a caretaker. Of course, evolution can in no way disprove God or His involvement in the world. Further, the evos constantly rant and rave that the answer to a question cannot be God did it.
You continue to attack religion instead of giving proof for your theory. Your statement is irrelevant as to whether evolution is true or not. What is relevant is whether species transform themselves into new, more complex species. In the 150 since Darwin wrote his book, no one has been able to give such proof.
The only "proof" that evolutionists ever give for their theory is attacks on religion and a repetition of the mantra 'evolution is science' which of course is totally false since they can give no proof of the veracity of their theory.
Absolutely wrong. I argue with your attack on religion as proving that evolution is true. Even if you were to disprove every single religion it would still not be proof of evolution. To prove evolution you need evidence, solid scientific evidence, a solid non-contradictory hypothesis, and many more things.
As to fossils, I have never said they are not relatively rare. However, we do have 100 times more fossils than we had when Darwin wrote and the fossils still do not prove evolution. In fact fossils will never be able to prove evolution due to:
a. the circular reasoning used in categorizing these fossils.
b. the lack of evidence they provide for the most important features of organisms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.