Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hewlett claims HP fixed Compaq vote
CNN Money ^ | March 28, 2002: 2:29 PM EST

Posted on 03/28/2002 11:24:29 AM PST by annalex

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:00:19 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: SamAdams76
If Compaq/HP merge, it will be a major cluster***k in my opinion and HP will probably come out worse in the bargain as their share of the printer market rapidly erodes around them.

Right on the money. HP needs to re-double it's printer R+D and kick crap out of the competition again. Buying into the shakey (at best) PC market is not the solution.

EBUCK

41 posted on 03/28/2002 2:29:20 PM PST by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Informed opinion is always welcomed. The honchos at HP see the same thing that you and I see. Printing profits are going to decrease and IT in all modalities will increase including what your company is doing.

Either you get on board the IT bus and fight for a seat or you lose in the business that HP and Compaq are in. They may get a seat, they may not, time will tell.

42 posted on 03/28/2002 2:40:28 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: annalex
Go Walter!
43 posted on 03/28/2002 2:57:48 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annalex
If Walter Hewlett has the goods to back up this charge, it could cook Carly Fiorina's goose.
44 posted on 03/28/2002 3:01:01 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beckett
" it could cook Carly Fiorina's goose."

Not much goose there to cook; great bones for the pooch though! :o)

45 posted on 03/28/2002 3:22:16 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MarkWar
HP is a giant, diversified company that has been around for a very long time.
H-P spun a lot of that diversity off into Agilent. A stupid move, but water over the dam now.
46 posted on 03/28/2002 3:33:20 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Have you ever met her? I have. She is a no account witch who's only plan is to make money for herself. She has no interest in seeing HP succeed. Just like Lucent, she's in it for personal gain.(period).
Amen to that. She is one of the vampires that killed a great American company. She is of the species of management that put career management first, second, and third. She will churn HP's numbers with acquisitions and divestitures until it all collapses, like LU.
47 posted on 03/28/2002 3:36:42 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
With the right moves the server bus. could be cornered
They COULD have taken advantage of the Intel IA 64 deal by "front running" Intel's technology shift with their servers. If they ported .Net Server to these systems Microsoft would leave skid marks on Unisys and dance with HP. But this opportunity is rapidly expiring.
48 posted on 03/28/2002 3:40:18 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: annalex
"Also, Compaq's core business is PCs, so it would allow Compaq, or what remains of it, to dominate the market."

You've made some excellent points above...........but this isn't one of 'em. This merger wouldn't help Compaq in the slightest to "dominate the market".

It's not axiomatic that taking a company and folding it into a larger company automatically makes company #1 "bigger" or more effective or more efficient.........or somehow miraculously improves their products, their fulfillment, their management.......their overall competitiveness. If anything, I believe it will hurt them one hell of a lot.

Why, you ask? Market confusion. I've been in the biz a long time, and I'll tell you that large customers like stability. This merger reeks of instability; an odor that is already sticking to both companies (HP & Compaq). IOW, it's already hurting both of them. That's a fact.

49 posted on 03/28/2002 3:45:07 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Hmmmmmmm, you mean she'd do something that stinky to guarantee her package of $70 mil when the deal gets done??That would be...unethical ;-)There have to be at least one or two emails or memos floating around that could prove Hewlett's claim, if it happened.Deutche bank ought to contact some Board members of HWP and push back :-)Bang the stock out.
50 posted on 03/28/2002 6:30:13 PM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
At a more macro level, it calls into question the inherent conflict of interest when investment banks own asset managers.

Clearly the zillion dollar suits in the high floor corner offices can dictate policy to green eyeshaders in the cube farm, and to hell with fiduciary responsibility to Aunt Minnie.

One hates to see a rationale for govt regs forcing firms to be in one business OR the other, but whorishly unethical types like Ms. Carly may give regulators a headline peg.

51 posted on 03/28/2002 6:43:00 PM PST by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: pegleg
The 9-1 vote is misleading...I know a number of CPQ shareholders who chose not to vote because on the CPQ side, and failure to vote was counted as a no vote. I belive the 9-1 margin is based on actual votes cast.

I only know of one employee who voted for it...I know at least 20 who voted against it.

This deal sucks!

52 posted on 03/28/2002 6:49:46 PM PST by TexasGunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ender@Game.now
CPQ employees were told there would be no raises this year (each year it occurs in the March time frame) *for anyone*. Then they set aside $330Mln for 6000 of Michael Capellas' friends to carve up. It makes me sick and is a clear indication of what he really thinks about employees and his fidiciary responsibilities.
53 posted on 03/28/2002 6:54:43 PM PST by TexasGunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: annalex
The first time I got a view of this "deal" on TV I knew it was a "get out of our way, sons of the founders, or be dam***." Now it's here in print:

"We find it regrettable that Mr. Hewlett has chosen to resort to baseless claims without regard to the impact of his false accusations on HP's business reputation and employees," HP said in a statement. "We continue our progress in planning for a successful integration of our merger with Compaq. We look forward to the receipt of the certified vote result from the HP shareowner meeting, which we expect within a few weeks."

54 posted on 03/28/2002 6:56:28 PM PST by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Deadweight. If you tried to give this business to Mike Dell for free he would scream and run away. He would rather eat anthrax than merge with the rotting corpse of the minicomputer business. The Digital deal sunk Compaq. That's why Compaq holders want sooooo much to sell.

You are mistaken on several counts:
1) Dell just hired Jeff Lynn (from CPQ) to build a services organization because it is an absolute requirement for providing a total solution which corporate customers demand. Dell is also actively looking to buy services companies - smaller ones that can be easily integrated into Dell.
2) DEC had an awesome services organization, and a number of other valuable assets.
3) The DEC/Tandem acquisitions hurt CPQ because they *never* successfully integrated the companies. They were major merger failures. To this day, there are Digital and Tandem domains within the enterprise. Even after nearly 4 years, CPQ hardware sellers are still not actively promoting services contracts (the key assumption to making the DEC acquisition work).
4) CPQ shareholders willing to sell are taking a short-term view of this. If they want to cash out, this is the quickest way to make back what they lost last year. Long-term, CPQ alone is a very good bet.

This deal should fail because the same people who failed to make the DEC/Tandem mergers work, are going to cause this to fail also.

55 posted on 03/28/2002 7:01:46 PM PST by TexasGunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: annalex
For all but very large control shareholders, expressing one's disagreement in a shareholder vote is not much of a remedy. In any case, I was simply pointing out how institutional and many other investors think about these issues: if you don't like the management, sell.
56 posted on 03/29/2002 5:24:50 AM PST by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Go Walter!

Sue them blind!

57 posted on 03/29/2002 6:32:49 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: eno_; Black Jade
>She is one of the vampires that killed a great American company.

I don't know. I've never met her, but I think she's kind of cute in the photos. To my eyes, she's got that Chrissie Evert kind of laser-eye tough girl look. I like it.

FYI, when I flipped over to HP to get that photo, I looked at their Board of Directors list and what name do I see first? "Condit!"

Philip M. Condit is chairman of the board and chief executive officer, the Boeing company, an aerospace manufacturer.
Patricia C. Dunn is co-chairman and global chief executive, Barclay's Global Investors, a global investment firm.
Carleton S. Fiorina is chairman and chief executive officer, HP.
Sam Ginn is retired chairman, Vodafone AirTouch Plc.
Richard A. Hackborn is former chairman and retired executive vice president, Computer Products Organization, HP.
Walter B. Hewlett is an independent software developer and chairman, Vermont Telephone Company.
George A. Keyworth II is chairman and senior fellow, the Progress & Freedom Foundation, a public policy research institute.
Robert E. Knowling Jr. is chairman and CEO, Internet Access Technologies Inc.
Robert P. Wayman is executive vice president and chief financial officer, HP.

In the IT business, HP has always been rumored to be the minicomputer of choice for the the black ops shops and government intelligence shops. Does anybody know if THIS Condit is related to the Gary Condit this forum knows so well?

Black Jade -- Are you aware of any links between Boeing, their Phil Condit, and Chandra's Gary Condit?

Mark W.

58 posted on 03/29/2002 6:33:32 AM PST by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: beckett
it could cook Carly Fiorina's goose.

You'd think that ruining Lucent should be enough cooking for her goose, but it appears that the management class these days can shake off the guilt of mere incompetence. Sue them.

59 posted on 03/29/2002 6:36:33 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline; MarkWar
This merger wouldn't help Compaq in the slightest to "dominate the market".

All I am really saying is that the deal is better for Compaq than it is for HP; MarkWar seems to hold the same opinion in #31. We all agree that the odds of market domination are still low. You are correct that market confusion would probably doom the PC business. Another way of saying that is, one can buy a company but one cannot buy that company's customers.

60 posted on 03/29/2002 6:44:07 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson