Chelsea's Tongue

Self | March 25, 2002 | PJ-Comix

[PJ-Comix]

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! I just saw a copy of the latest Globe magazine on the supermarket checkout line and Chelsea Clinton is featured tongue kissing with her boyfriend on the cover. This pic (below) has already been posted here but it doesn't do justice to the actual hardcopy cover photo since her tongue is clearly seen on the actual cover. The ironic thing is that millions of folks who are buying food at the supermarket checkout lines will lose their appetites when they see Chelsea's tongue leaping out at them from the newpaper racks.

BTW, how are folks going to explain that tongue kiss to their kids if they are asked about it while waiting on the checkout line? I mean that photo sure does leap out at you.

[janette]

that's a joke right!, You won't put power on people who say, that in rual America, it doesn't matter who you are-most importand thing is, .... you are are a girl! I don't know the word for..... I just say "zum Kotzen"!

[GB]

So what if a photo of the Bush twins kissing boys, with or without tongues, appeared on the cover of a national magazine? First off, I think it would play a whole lot better than Jenna falling down drunk, but I guess I'm a voice in the wilderness here in not falling victim to Clinton-obsession and having faith in the American people to take this for what it is and really not pay a whole lot of attention to it.

[GB]

OK, please spell out how you think she COULD win the presidency.

I do not think she has a prayer of carrying anything other than the really hard-core liberal states ... and I think except for D.C., those are in play as well ... simply because she scares and polarizes people. Bill Clinton won because people liked him. G.W. Bush won because people liked him. Ronald Reagan won because people liked him. Bush pere won not so much because people liked him, but because his opponent was patently unlikeable. I know we'd like to all sit on our high horses and say that people win because of their policies/philosophies/etc., but in presidential elections, it usually comes down to likeability. I've given the example of my father here before, who was philosophically an old-line Labor Democrat and advocated positions that were polar opposite to the GOP, but voted Republican because he liked the candidates, particularly Reagan and Bush pere, better. My point, finally, is this ... who outside the nut left actually likes Hillary Clinton? Nobody (not even Bill). She doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning the middle of the country that decides elections. Again, she'll scare 'em to death.

[GB]

Again, you presuppose that there is "goodwill" attached to the name Clinton that will be there for Chelsea down the road. I submit that there won't be.

[serune]

You do not need advice janette. Perfect as you are. : )

[janette]

thanks a whole lot, I still got not flamed, thank you all, it might be something I said right, even I'm coming from a different culture, but actually, you Americans and we Europeans have a lot in comment. More than the people in Europe know!

[GB]

I'm a member of the media, BTW, although not liberal ... but say the media does promote Chelsea Clinton (although I'd be stunned if it happens). Does that automatically mean, without a doubt, that the people will buy it? Does that automatically mean goodwill will be created? I mean, the media could push Charles Manson for president, but how much good will that do? I think people on the right assign way too much power to the media, and it sickens me that everyone is sitting around cringing in fear about the potential of Chelsea Clinton getting into politics or Hillary running for president. Plus I guess a lot of my conservative brethren have lost faith in the American people after they elected Slick twice. The liberal media had nothing to do with Slick getting elected. Slick would've gotten elected ... I think even if Perot hadn't run ... if he'd ritually sacrificed a virgin in the Capitol Rotunda and ran screaming and dripping with blood proclaiming himself to be the reincarnation of John Quincy Adams, because the American people liked him better than the two dud candidates we ran. It was Slick's time and place, and the American people knew he was an adulterer and a snake-oil salesman, but made a deal with the devil and put him in office for eight years.

But again, he was one of a kind. It was the man, not the name "Clinton," that made the difference. And I don't think his wife's in the same ball park, and I seriously doubt Chelsea will be either.

[PoisedWoman]

Seldom has Chelsea looked more mod: in profile, hair pulled back and skin aglow, eye shadow defining simplicite, sunglasses stylishly aloft, and there, her hand gripping his shoulder with just a hint of passion.

Surely you jest. Chelsea is gross and disgusting and so is her little embrionic liberal politician boyfriend Ian Klaus, best known at his university for his penetrating writing on homophobia and racism in South Africa. Neither of them has passion for anything but riding the wave of publicity into elected office. And perhaps you missed Ms. Clinton's article in Talk Magazine after 9/11 saying all she could think of as the buildings came down was GWBush's budget cuts. And how they would effect rebuilding of NY.....Gross doesn't begin to cover it. Besides, she looks, if not disgusting, then at least revolting with her icky tongue hanging out.

[Intolerant in NJ]

LOL - reminds me of the Conan O'Brien bit a few years ago where he would morph the faces of well known couples who were going together at the time to show what their kids might look like - he did Bill and Monica and showed a picture of the resulting child - a cigar wearing a baby's bonnet lying in a bassinet...I laughed for at least a week.....

[GB]

Hillary's comments didn't play very well, did they?

See, that's the difference I guess between me and a lot of folks here. Everybody gets his knickers in a wad because one of the Clintons says something stupid ... but I view it in the terms of "how is this playing to the electorate," and I don't think it's played very well. So I say, let the fools flap their gums all they want to. They're cutting their own throats.

[GB]

Name one time when the media elected a president. Again, you give the media way too much credit.

[GB]

Can't argue with you ... check your private email here, BTW.

[RLK]

OK, please spell out how you think she COULD win the presidency.

--------------------

I shouldn't need to answer that question, and you shouldn't have asked it. I'll tell you the answer even though you won't hear it.

Need I remind you George Bush didn't do very well running against a complete idiot in the last election? The same people who voted for the Clintons and Owlgore previously will vote for Hillary. Additionally, if one woman in 50 votes for Hillary because she is a woman, and Hillary will make it the issue, the result will be slaughter. Right now, the Republicans have nobody with charisma to run. ...and so forth. I realize say that or anything else won't make a dent, but it's the truth. Hillary runs very shrewd campaigns.

[serune]

Beauty is not defined by politics, it radiates from within, and if you cannot see Chelsea's tenderness in that kiss, I feel sorry for you. Your destain for everything Clinton has blinded your eyes and closed your heart to love. Sad indeed.

[Dianna]

And you NEVER kissed anyone that way, right?