Gun control advocate may have violated gun laws

Kentucky.com ^ | Thu, Mar. 21, 2002 | Timothy J. Burger

[RFP]

Did you guys see this yet? If not, 2nd Amendment PING )))))))

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Read that in my e-mail. Ain't this a hoot?!?

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Thanks for the ping.

Brady writes in "A Good Fight" that the unnamed gun shop ran federal Brady Law and Delaware state background checks with great fanfare.

...

"(W)hen the owner called in the checks, it seemed to me he spoke unnecessarily loudly, repeating and spelling my name over and over on the phone," Brady writes.

Pretty d*mn funny!

[stand watie]

!

[LowOiL]

The Site has changed the article to this now.. FYI..

Posted on Thu, Mar. 21, 2002

Correction

A New York Daily News story incorrectly reported that gun control advocate Sarah Brady may have skirted Delaware's gun laws when she bought a rifle for her adult son but did not declare who was going to own the weapon.

The Delaware Department of Justice initially insisted to the Daily News that gun purchasers must declare who the weapon was intended for so that person's background could be checked.

On Friday, a spokeswoman for the Delaware Department of Justice said it misinterpreted the law and Brady was not obligated to state that the gun was for her son as long as he was legally qualified to own a gun.

In addition, a spokesman for Brady said, "Sarah Brady told the gun store that the gun was for her son and filled out the forms that they asked her to fill out."

[Fixit]

Good catch, thanks for the update.