Posted on 03/19/2002 2:33:12 PM PST by FresnoDA
1. How did Danielle van Dam leave her home for the last time?
Carried out DEAD= 72%
Carried out ALIVE= 5%
Walked out voluntarily with someone she felt she could trust= 17%.
Walked out alone, possibly to get help for parents, other(s) or dog= 6%.
p
p
2. Who is guilty of any felonies under California law in connection with the Danielle Van Dam case?
Her parent(s) and no one else= 20%;
Her parents----- but possible accessory and aiding/abetting, knowing& not-telling, body-disposal etc on part of others= 40%;
Some conspiracy involving more or less equal felonious guilt between one or more of her parents, and another party or parties= 13%;
Basically another is guilty--- but one or both VD's are covering, aiding/abetting, withholding guilty knowledge, obstructing etc.=8%.
VD's are not guilty of a felony w r t Danielle disappearance Feb 1/2 night, but may be guilty of drug charges or child neglect generally...But felonious guilt resides with someone other than either of her parents =19%. The 19 may be further subdivided, into Westerfield 13%, other guests from 10 AM on 2/1 to 10 AM on 2/2: 5% ; total stranger 1%.
You will note that there is some 73 to 81% the VDs are guilty of a felony, but only some 13 to 21% chance that Westerfield is guilty of a felony unless he and her parents were in cahoots and had a deal from the beginning.
1) the use of prostitution by runaway and thrownaway children to provide for their subsistence needs;Further, the investigators confirmed that:
2) the presence of pre-existing adult prostitution markets in the communities where large numbers of street youth are concentrated;
3) prior history of child sexual abuse and child sexual assault;
4) poverty;
5) the presence of large numbers of unattached and transient males in communities--including military personnel, truckers, conventioneers, sex tourists, among others;
6) for some girls, membership in gangs;
7) the promotion of juvenile prostitution by parents, older siblings and boy friends;
8) the recruitment of children by organized crime units for prostitution; and, in-creasingly,
9) illegal trafficking of children for sexual purposes to the U.S. from developing countries lo-cated in Asia, Africa, Central and South America, and Central and Eastern Europe.
1) Between 244,000 and 325,000 American children and youth are victimized by sexual exploitation each year;
2) as a group, sexually exploited children are quite heterogeneous and include children living in their own homes as well as children who are runaways and thrownaways;
3) sexual exploiters consist mostly of men, but some women and juveniles (including older siblings) sexually exploit children as well;
4) the major groups of sexual exploiters of children include:a) family members and acquaintances;
b) strangers;
c) pedophiles;
d) transient males including military personnel, truck drivers, seasonal workers, conventioneers and sex tourists, among others;
e) “opportunistic” exploiters, i.e., persons who will sexually abuse whoever is available for sex including children, but who may subsequently focus on children;
f) pimps;
g) traffickers; and
h) other juveniles;
5) criminal networks are actively involved in the sexual exploitation of children and profit significantly from that exploitation;
6) substantial numbers of foreign children are trafficked into the U.S. for sexual purposes; and
7) significant numbers of American youth also are trafficked for sexual purposes across the U.S. and, in some cases, to other economically advanced countries. The report concludes with 11 recommendations that are designed to strengthen the nation’s (and region’s) capacity for protecting vulnerable youth from both CSE and the CSEC.
And why you should NOT give Kool Aid to children to drink. Blehh!
GI detect a pattern here..
Adobe ImageReady or Photoshop,then GIF Construction Set to animate (there is an Animation Wizard included).
I know enough to get by...luckily they don't pay me here to do graphics.
Um, polls measure opinions not chance. There is some slight difference in meaning.
In the meantime, I'm glad that we don't judge the unarrested and uncharged by majority vote.
I'm still in the vocal minority that say SDPD has investigated, arrested and charged and arraigned and bound over for trial their main suspect. And will have to prove his guilt in a court of law before a jury of his peers. AND that unless and untill likewise arrested,charged,arraigned and bound over, the VD's remain victims, not defendants in this court action.
And FDA should change his handle, and I should get credit for it! LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.