Posted on 03/16/2002 1:32:37 PM PST by humbletheFiend
LOL! What on earth? The handling of finances I referred to was public knowledge. No one denied it; it was controversial (and some thought unethical, I have read) but completely out in the open.
Daughter agreed with both of us, then somebody, rdf or KFP I think, accused her of rumor-mongering, but they won't say what the rumor is.
Next, KFP asked HTF if he was the same as Ian Sherwood. Registered replied that HTF & Ian ARE the same, so I wondered if since Registered KNOWS and Ian uses lots of graphics like Registered does, Registered is really all 3 people.
Does that make sense?
Keep me out of this. It wasn't me who accused anyone of "rumour-mongering." I don't even want to get involved in any of this silliness.
I did ask humblethefiend if he and IanSherwood are the same person, because I suspect they are because of their similar "styles."
It was rdf, and I don't particularly think defending myself from an accusation of spreading false rumors is "silly"; apparently, I should be more concerned with which posters have similar "styles", or some such thing. That's the important stuff.
Now I do!
Um........I think so.....lol
I never thought about the graphic similarity........hmmmmmmmm.
I would not necessarily agree, but I will take your advice and argue my points on a thread more suited to the issue.
I'll ping you if Richard ever lets us know which part is true and which part is malicious gossip.
And Torie thinks that humbletheFiend is very similar to a poster named "Fusion"....meantime Registered confirms that humbletheFiend and IanSherwood are the same person.
Interesting theories, but I'm not sure what any of this has to do with whether or not Alan Keyes is making sense.
Meantime, why don't you think about "Which part is true ..."
As to "malicious gossip" that is your expression, not mine. I had written, "Rumor and speculation."
I am perfectly content to let that stand for now.
I regret that you don't wish to discuss further the notions of "Constitutionalist" and "Declarationist" or their place WRT the column.
I had thought that might have been fruitful.
Best to you,
Richard F.
I had thought that might have been fruitful.
Sorry, I must have misunderstood - I was ready to, but thought you said you would prefer to discuss those on the Civil War II threads. Now I'll have to remember what I'd meant to say.
My fault, I guess. I meant to be kidding. We'd probably do much better here, without the neo-rebs ...
Richard F.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.