Posted on 03/13/2002 12:03:22 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
At this point, your arguments are purely philosophical. Congress has passed an open-ended Resolution authorizing any use of force necessary to neutralize terrorist forces, as however they are defined by the Executive branch (the Army and the intel forces). I suspect that the Resolution was not made more specific for a simple, and non-sinister reason: Congress has no idea who the likely suspects are (or, at least, they did not at the time of the Authorization). I haven't had a chance to track down the re-authorization Resolution - It may be more specific.
I'm sure that if the Executive were to try to do something which Congress does not approve, Congress has the converse power to issue a Resolution removing all lawful authorization from the Executive, and then can impeach those in the Executive who choose not to obey the negation of authorization (be it the President, his Cabinet, or those reporting to them, Congress still has the power to cause them to seek other employment...)
:) ttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.