Posted on 03/11/2002 1:40:21 PM PST by IronJack
But I'm sure if Bush signs the CFR bill for instance, Keyes will not hesitate to be critical of the decision not to veto the bill. Keyes first loyalties are to the Constitution and the Declaration Principles, in other words to the good of the nation rather than to any particular administration or person.
As regards both the CFR and immigration bills, Keyes has made his views known. As I've said before elsewhere, one of Alan's most important functions is to provide policymakers with the moral headlights needed to assist them in staying on the right path.
But once the President makes a decision, I am confident that Alan and all neo-Keyseians will remain supportive of his presidency and of his reelection in 2004.
All things considered, I think it's still true that Alan Keyes is "not a Bush Republican," since it is clear he still disagrees with Bush's tendency to be soft on many conservative issues. Keyes is, and always will be, a "Reagan Republican": someone who is stalwart in speaking the truth and standing for what's right, regardless of what's popular or partisan.
My hope is that Bush will become a "Reagan Republican," too. His veto of CFR would be a big step in that direction. It would take a lot of courage to stand against this politically-correct, unconstitutional legislation.
Tonight's show was a good example of Keyes' support of Bush: he seemed to agree with the administration's nuclear strategy, or at least much of it, but he disagreed with Bush on the amnesty thing. He essentially said it was bad political maneuver meant to please Mexico.
I think this illustrates that it can't be said that Keyes has "changed his tune" about Bush, and neither can it be said that Keyes is a "Bush-basher."
It's not who you support, it's what you support that counts. That's obviously the rule Keyes lives by.
Yes, and even though he criticized the amnesty policy, he avoided mentioning Bush's name in relation to it. He may be a critic on policies in which he disagrees with President Bush, but by no means is he a "Bush-basher."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.