Posted on 02/23/2002 3:18:16 PM PST by Burkeman1
While the big lie of the right was accepted as false decades ago, the big lie of the left goes on and on and on........
This is way beyond silly and inaccurate on so many levels I don't know where to start...however; please point me to the documentation that Harry Hopkins was a spy.
I think several Central Europeon Countries might disagree with you! Wow-
I'll bite. Disagree with me about what?
...crawl back into you hateful little ignornat hole.
Pretty nasty but I'll stay out here in the open if it is oakie doakie with you...
Any number of legitimate studies have shown a well defined correlation between income/crime/unemployment.
Biggest lie of the right. Race causes crime
I have never seen that charge. Can you point me to a source.
PAYROLL DEDUCTION! I have actually met people who swear they don't pay any taxes because they always get a refund!
I may have mis-thought the phrasing on the lie of the right. It would be better stated that race alone can be used as a measure of worthiness and justice.
This lie has been the cause of history's most horrific excesses -- the Holocaust, the excesses of Japanese fascists, the genocide in Bosnia today -- it has been put largely to rest in this country.
There are only two races -- the decent and the indecent. We are only allowed or justified to hate those who behave indecently -- not the race these individuals happen to belong to.
Thanks for making me rethink my phrasing, hope my opinions are easier to understand now.
You advocate a blatantly immoral code and accuse me of being ammoral. That's about as absurd as the French and Russians getting caught cheating in the olympic judging and then hollering about how they are the victims. What hoot!
What a joke. I guess its okay with you if your neighbors can prostitute themselves, flagging down tricks on the corner. If your daughter decides to join them, I assume you have no problem because, after all, being a whore is wonderful.
No, it is not okay with me. However, so long as they do not violate rights, I am not justified in the initiation of force to impose my moral code upon them. Unlike you, I will not stoop to the level of violating the rights of others in a feel good scheme to protect people from their own choices which do not violate the rights of others.
A person living by a moral code of decency is the rif-raf and the whores are the heros in your book.
Your moral code, as you've advocated here, is anything but decent. Is the most abhorrent example of abuse. You use the same exact justification that the monsters of the 20th century used while oppressing and exterminating their fellow man. Your moral code is corrupt. It is a necrosis on the flesh of society.
Don't worry, I do understand where you come from. There is no right or wrong in your world.
On the contrary. I uphold a very strong position on justice, right and wrong. As such, I judge your stand on this issue as evil.
Incest between a grown father and daughter is okay with you because you live in a subjective libertopia where the only thing you care about is your right to act like a pig isn't infringed upon.
You are the one acting like a pig with your filthy analogies. Frankly I have to wonder why you are obsessed with drugs, prostitution and incest. I suppose that is just one more symptom of your diseased moral code.
Right...picking up tricks in a family neighborhood infringes upon no one. Garbage.
Perhaps you would care to explain EXACTLY which right of yours has been violated if your neighbor accepts cash in exchange for having sexual intercourse with an acquaintence? Be specific now. I want to know exactly which right of yours has been violated.
And you're a mean self-serving jerk who has no standards and wants no standards for anything.
On the contrary. I do want standards. The difference between you and me is that I'll seek to achieve those standards through persuasion and mutual contractual agreement. You seek to impose your standards at the muzzle of a government gun.
You and Peter Singer could be kin.
I'm afraid you've got it backwards again. It is your perverted system that would allow a Peter Singer to convince his neighbors that they have a "right" to live in a neighborhood free of imperfect or deformed or colored children and then pass a law to eliminate them. My moral code declares that each and every human, even the pre-born child, has individual rights which must be protected. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that you even advocate abortion in cases of rape. Tell me if I'm wrong.
Your low because you can't recognize truth even if it bit you in the arz--that people whoring up and down a family neighborhood is wrong. Concretely wrong.
There you go obsessing with illicit sex again. Are you sick, or just frustrated?
Whatever. Talk to yourself. You're the only one who's listening anyway.
It is obvious that you do not listen. Nevertheless, since I choose not to engage in bullying or violence, I will continue to simply express my disagreement with your foul ideas using words. I doubt you'll bother to actually read them, but it will give you another opportunity to fantasize about nasty sex stuff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.