Skip to comments.
Judge to Rule on Abortion, Breast Cancer Link
Women's E-news ^
| 02/17/02
| Margaret A. Woodbury, WEnews correspondent
Posted on 02/19/2002 7:07:21 AM PST by patent
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: MissMillie;*SASU; JMJ333; Tourist Guy; EODGUY; proud2bRC; abandon; Khepera; Dakmar; RichInOC...
Well actually it does not matter if there is a link to breast cancer. What matters is that they are killing babies and the United States alone is responsible for killing far greater numbers of babies than the Nazis killed Jews. The only valid question is "Are you guilty of supporting or participating in the murders of babies?" If you're not (At the very least) speaking out in opposition to Abortion or you're not in jail for protesting Abortion then you are guilty. SASU
21
posted on
02/25/2002 9:27:57 AM PST
by
Khepera
To: Khepera
They spelled "killer" wrong on George's birth certificate...
To: Khepera
In most cases, abortion deserves life in prison, same as any other murder...
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I noticed that so I figured killer was his middle name.
24
posted on
02/25/2002 11:22:35 AM PST
by
Khepera
To: patent
Linda Rosenthal, a lawyer with the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy in New York who is representing the clinic, argues that the suit is one more attempt by pro-life activists to politicize what should really be a scientific matter. Is that so, Linda? Then what do you call it when the federal administration decides to make the child health insurance program available to preborn children and you and your ilk scream about it? What do you call it when you reject all attempts to scientifically define when human life begins and ends?
I call it hypocracy.
Your genocidal tendencies, Linda, have never been scientific. They have always been political. They have as much to do with health as my job has to do with goldfish. (Hint: I don't even own a goldfish, let alone ever deal with them on the job.)
You are a prime reason why some believe that women should be seen and not heard. When women like you are heard, it is at best revolting.
Shalom.
25
posted on
02/25/2002 1:35:23 PM PST
by
ArGee
To: Khepera
Who cares about this study when they are murdering babies? Whether you stop a murderer by convincing him that murder is wrong, or by convincing him that he will be caught and get the chair, you have still stopped the murderer. To the intended victim, I'm not sure it matters very much which method you used.
Shalom.
26
posted on
02/25/2002 1:37:17 PM PST
by
ArGee
To: MissMillie
Suppose we do a study and try to see what you are saying... The survey says... I'm not sure.
Are you supporting or against Murdering innocent children, I mean abortion?
27
posted on
02/26/2002 4:02:43 AM PST
by
wwjdn
To: patent;khepera;argee
Here is a nother scientific study which cannot be refuted by a rational being: Abortion causes death! Always the child and sometimes the mother.
Let's stop using the PC lunatics words, it isn't abortion, it's MURDER!!! Abortion is trying to "sugar coat the term" and make it more appealing.
28
posted on
02/26/2002 4:06:15 AM PST
by
wwjdn
To: wwjdn
Gee, I thought this thread was about whether or not a women's health clinic should be forced to report on a "link" that may or may not actually exist.
Interesting that you can't stay on topic.
To: MissMillie
I was trying to understand your post, I did not mean any harm or to flame you.
30
posted on
02/26/2002 7:02:21 AM PST
by
wwjdn
To: patent; 2nd amendment mama; A2J; aposiopetic; attagirl; axel f; Balto_Boy; bulldogs; Charlie OK; ...
ProLife Ping! If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
31
posted on
02/18/2003 12:38:00 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(But let justice roll on like a river, righteousness like a never-failing stream!)
To: MissMillie
We have been warned over and over about drinking and driving. You can drop the milk bottle, spill it in your lap, strangle on it, have it go down the wrong pipe. Lotsa trouble there.
To: Mr. Silverback
Why ping us on an old article?
33
posted on
02/18/2003 12:53:36 PM PST
by
Khepera
(Do not remove by penalty of law!)
Comment #34 Removed by Moderator
To: Khepera
Sorry. Misread the posting date and thought it was from today.
35
posted on
02/18/2003 1:57:05 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(We don't care what you say, we're gonna bomb them anyway!)
To: madprof98
I don't understand your point. Is it an even higher percentage? Those $hit$ in Planned Parenthood will do anything to murder a few more, that's for sure.
To: Taiwan Bocks; Saundra Duffy; patent; Khepera; Mr. Silverback; wwjdn; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; ...
37
posted on
02/18/2003 9:46:22 PM PST
by
attagirl
To: Taiwan Bocks
I don't understand your point. Is it an even higher percentage? Those $hit$ in Planned Parenthood will do anything to murder a few more, that's for sure. It is almost certainly a lower percentage. In fact, the latest thing from Planned Parenthood is a 35% figure, but there's no explanation for the downward revision. The point of putting out the highest possible estimate is to make it sound as if abortion is "No big deal, everybody's doing it."
To: madprof98
Thanks for that.
Wow! How sad, 'no big deal.'
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson