Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disarming Dubya
The American Partisan ^ | 9 February, 2002 | J. King

Posted on 02/09/2002 3:08:47 PM PST by The Right Stuff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: RightThinkinDood
Leadership, it's hard to define but you know it when you see it.

We HAVE seen it in President Bush. Look again and you too might get a glimmer.

81 posted on 02/10/2002 6:23:41 PM PST by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RightThinkinDood
"The difference is that anyone with half a brain or any knowledge of Bush's history knows Bush never had a policy that was his, he's a blank slate...He's a follower."

You're not from Texas, are you?

And, if you are, you haven't been paying attention for the past eight years, have you?

82 posted on 02/10/2002 6:25:25 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RightThinkinDood
knows Bush never had a policy that was his, he's a blank slate. He had handlers who made all his decisions including recruiting his team***

Wait....I'm channelling Alexander Haig.....this statement is verbatim UCLA Daily Bruin Talk Via 1982 (I wuz there!). Talking points, the same. Hmmm, must be a Vulcan Time Warp....

Yep, diagnosis complete, Captain. The Left never changes, they only rely on the ignorance (fostered by them, of course) of the masses. It's the Reagan/Bush Mind Meld - same talking points, different generation.

Can we hope that they will be as ignorant as the prior one?

83 posted on 02/10/2002 6:25:53 PM PST by The Right Stuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: wattsmag2
It stands for "wondering why there is so little substance to the arguments for war."
84 posted on 02/10/2002 6:29:27 PM PST by Dan W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
Perhaps you can enlighten all of us on "proper rhetoric?" Is "undeclared war" improper also, since it applies to both Vietnam and Afghanistan? Maybe you could outline all the rules of proper discourse so you can understand me, and then come up with something that comes close to refuting what I am posting ?
85 posted on 02/10/2002 6:33:39 PM PST by Dan W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Mygirlsmom
Bravo! Seeing Pres. Bush last nite mingling amongst the US athletes at the opening ceremonies of the Olympics was a perfect example of the essence of our great leader. He's one of us, as comfortable with us as we are with him, but yet with a genuine presence of leadership. And we feel it more deeply and genuinely than any phony "Ah feel your pain" could ever hope to elicit.

Well said.

And this is more than evident in the faces in the crowd around Bush...when he was with the US atheletes, the US military etc. etc....the obvious enthusiasm, the beaming smiles.American pride.. Bush really connects with the average American, and I just love seeing it.

86 posted on 02/10/2002 6:40:04 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Your analogies are misplaced. They have nothing to do with invading another country without a declaration of war. Why do you not want to follow U.S. law ?

Columbo couldn't do any worse than the U.S. military in finding Osama, without I might add the huge loss of innocent life.

This is again, I repeat, a public forum. If you want a private yes-man party don't post on Free Republic.

87 posted on 02/10/2002 6:42:10 PM PST by Dan W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Dan W
Oh no, you go right ahead. I love to watch self-destruction. If you think you are getting anywhere with this, by all means.....please continue.
88 posted on 02/10/2002 6:43:07 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: The Right Stuff
BTTT!
89 posted on 02/10/2002 6:47:10 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: solo gringo
"Out where the handclasp's a little stronger. Out where the smile lasts a little longer. That's where the West begins."
90 posted on 02/10/2002 6:49:06 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dan W
"They have nothing to do with invading another country without a declaration of war"

The Bey of Tripoli would be shocked to find that his was not a country...

"Columbo couldn't do any worse than the U.S. military in finding Osama, without I might add the huge loss of innocent life."

I guess, in your book, the lives and futures of the Afghan people -- and, in particular, the Afghan women -- don't count for much. Hardly worth freeing from the yoke of the Taliban, huh?

Granted, that wasn't the objective. But, like collateral damage, there is also a collateral benefit. Don't you agree?

"This is again, I repeat, a public forum."

I was right! It is how you get your jollies...

91 posted on 02/10/2002 6:53:19 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
What about the 3000+ they murdered here on September 11, 2001? Seeing as how I nearly was one of those, I take particular exception to the anti-war whiny wussies.

That, too. The Taliban and El Qaeda have murdered many nore people than we have ever killed by accident. And there is no question - civilians we have killed were by accident; civilians that the Taliban and Al Qaeda killed were on purpose!

92 posted on 02/10/2002 6:54:37 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: The Right Stuff
Right on! The media hated Reagan and do not understand Bush (nor do they want to). They were in love with the Big He because he wasted so much time on pop culture and loved being the hip dude-- in other words, all sizzle and no steak. Bush, like Reagan, has a healthy respect for the office and could really care less about the latest gossip. They are down to earth, secure men who understand the importance of the office and do not need, or want, the approval of the glitterati.
93 posted on 02/10/2002 6:56:28 PM PST by RecallJeffords
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: RightThinkinDood
Bush does what he's told and it shows. He's a follower.

Actually it is Bush who has quite a following.

Tell that the the rest of the Sorelosermans who simply cannot stand the fact that Bush is proving to be a truly successful and great leader...and has the poll numbers to go along with it.
Must be very painful for you.

94 posted on 02/10/2002 6:57:47 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Dan W
So you justify yourself by stooping to the level of the Taliban ? What about the cherished "rule of law," and the Constitution ? Thrown out the window ?

What nonsense! The Constitution you are referring to is probably the Constitution of the US although I'm not sure you know that. Did the Taliban use the US Constitution to determine which people they could stone to death? Or beat?
Do you have any clue that our Constitution applies only to American citizens?
I could have stopped that question after the first five words.....

95 posted on 02/10/2002 7:02:27 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Dan W
Just a question, what do you think would happen if you harbored a mass murderer and "world's most wanted man" on your property or in your home? The US was completely justified in their pursuit of Bin Laden in afganistan and their displacement of the barbaric regime that harbored him. By the way, the prosecution of this action was supported by the vast majority of the world community and received unanimous support from NATO. Now, put your helmet back on before you hurt yourself.
96 posted on 02/10/2002 7:17:53 PM PST by mfreddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Dan W
Dubya stepped right into Osama's trap.

Yeah, osamma's death trap for over 3,000 innocents. Even today they pulled out more remains. Don't feel very charitable right now so as far as I am concerned, they can all go straight to hell.

97 posted on 02/10/2002 7:36:29 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dan W
And wondering you will always be, no doubt.
98 posted on 02/11/2002 5:54:29 AM PST by wattsmag2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: SpookBrat
Bump for a good read.

Shalom.

99 posted on 02/11/2002 9:04:37 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PleaseNoMore
We watch the speaches together and they think that W is so "cool".

It's especially cool that politics is, once again, a suitable subject for family viewing now that the Porno-king is out of office.

The things I had to explain to my children when X-42 was in charge ...

Shalom.

100 posted on 02/11/2002 9:07:44 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson