Posted on 01/07/2002 1:15:35 PM PST by expose
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:50:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Oh really, then why are one day old babys treated for hepatitus-b without a diagnosis of the mother?
Answer: because paid LIARS buy off pols to force vaccines on them regardless of the lives destroyed in their wake.
That's the action of a radical, liberal and a green
Your actions show you lack common sense and your medical opinions are being spoon fed to you by Jocelyn Elders.
Uh huh. With reasoning like that, you may as well blame autism on sunspot cycles.
The problem is that we are being asked to vaccinate kids with vaccines that carry risk when the potential for benefit is low. My kids are NOT at risk for Hep B. Furthermore, if I had to vaccinate again, I would vaccinate on my OWN timetable, when my babies were older and stronger.
Look, I AM in favor of vaccines. All of my children took and received their vaccines with nothing but a little achiness and fever for some of them. I also know a baby who was hospitalized and almost died from a vaccine. His mother and one of the doctors who attended him believes that had he been older and stronger he wouldn't have almost died. Of course, his pediatritian would never admit that. No one knows, for sure. I just know that I wouldn't take that chance with my baby if I were pregnant. I know what MY risks for hep are.
Vaccine decisions are not made by hearsay.
The vaccination protocol of the United States is created with input from various governmental agencies and non-profit organizations in healthcare. While I may share your cynicism, I am not so foolish to share your fear.
Vaccinations have saved millions. Those on this board who are so militant and foolish in their FEAR of a vaccine have not watched children with contracted diseases DIE of the DISEASE.
I blame it on vaccines - read post 233.. if you have nothing else relavent to add then STFU!
BTW I blame hep-b outbreaks on queer sissies named Harrison, not mothers and their children.
I am not in fear of a vaccine. I just have a brain, and choose to use it. I don't need someone in Washington who accesses risks for general populations, to determine the risk of hep for my child. It's called parental rights. Or don't you believe in them?
(And if you'll recall, I'm the one who made the remark that it's easy for the "no vaccines" crowd not to vaccinate, when other parents ARE vaccinating their children, thereby lowering the risk to their children. I absolutely believe in vaccinations, in general. I just believe that I, as a parent, know what's best for children. FYI, I am adopting two orphans from overseas, and while I want to vaccinate them fairly soon, I don't intend to do so until they have been home a few weeks, and are stronger and healthier. I will keep them home until then. I have made the determination that this will carry the least risk for my children.)
2. It is unwise for people to keep their children UNimmunized around you. 3. The fact you are bringing an UNimmunized child into our nation from a foreign land and that YOU have chosen to KEEP that newly immigrated child UNimmunized is disturbing. The reality is that the child (if exposed to a contagious disease in the last few weeks prior to arrival) could pose an infectious risk on all the babies around him/her.
I strongly encourage you to immunize the child PRIOR to departing the foreign nation.
I don't intend for them to go without for months. Just three or four weeks, and we WILL stay home. Since we're all vaccinated, we WILL be ok. Thanks for your concern. I've thought a lot about this, and this is what I've decided to do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.