Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taking Command in Crisis, Bush Wields New Powers
The New York Times ^ | 01/01/2002 | ELISABETH BUMILLER with DAVID E. SANGER

Posted on 12/31/2001 6:28:14 PM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 12/31/2001 6:28:14 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
bump
2 posted on 12/31/2001 6:39:04 PM PST by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
That is also a telling example of the Bush style. In the first days after the attacks, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney decided that all the major strategic decisions about the war would be made in Washington. They built a coalition in the loosest sense ? with the exception of Britain, all the members were nonvoting partners.
I wondered why I wasn't consulted.
3 posted on 12/31/2001 6:40:30 PM PST by Asclepius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"I am about to sign this order," an aide recalled Mr. Bush saying. "Why am I not announcing it?"

Given the high marks he got for announcing all human beings were no longer created equal but, rather, some were manufactured in Excess of Market Demand and therefore suitable for enforced sacrificing of their lives for the really Living, I have a hard time believing Bush or his administration have a hard time announcing whatever new powers -- or funding -- they've ordained for themselves in the name of 'crisis', comrade.

4 posted on 12/31/2001 6:44:08 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Could these two reporters be any bitchier if they tried?

They make "taking command in a crisis" sound like an impeachable offense.

5 posted on 12/31/2001 6:47:47 PM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"I am about to sign this order," an aide recalled Mr. Bush saying. "Why am I not announcing it?"

Given the high marks he got a fortnight prior to 911 -- when he announced that all human beings were no longer created equal but, rather, some were manufactured in Excess of Market Demand and therefore suitable for enforced sacrificing of their lives for the really Living -- I have a hard time believing Bush or his administration have any trouble trumpteting whatever new powers -- or funding -- they've ordained for themselves in the name of 'crisis', comrade.

6 posted on 12/31/2001 6:47:47 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Bush Wields New Powers

This article didn't even mention his laser heat-ray vision, let alone his (to be revealed in a later installment) cowboy hat of cosmic power.

7 posted on 12/31/2001 6:53:01 PM PST by avg_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
You construct a sentence in a very unique manner.But whatever you said was much too big a bite and too tough a chew all in one go.Make clarity your friend ;-)
8 posted on 12/31/2001 6:56:10 PM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
Sorry for the double post ... I did try to clean it up a little after getting the most awesome error message (never thinking the first actually posted).

Speaking of bites ... it is a hell of bitter pill for me swallow, having to vest my trust and this nation's "moral" leadership in a man who so clearly understands lives Not Worth Living.

9 posted on 12/31/2001 7:13:14 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Happy New Year, Poke.

"I said," Mr. Obey recalled, " `You can say anything you want, this is your house, Mr. President. But I've been coming down here for 30 years, and this is the first time that a president has told me his mind is closed before the subject is even opened.' " Mr. Bush was unmoved. "Thank you very much," he told the delegation, several people present said. "I've got another meeting."
Doesn't it just break your heart? lol
10 posted on 12/31/2001 7:25:11 PM PST by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugh Akston
Same to you and yours Hugh!

When I read that, I nearly broke down crying. eheh

11 posted on 12/31/2001 7:27:54 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
I suppose that is one way of looking at it.

Another way of looking at it is that he is not Jesus, and as such was unable to bring the dead back to life. As such, the course to take was the one which would rally public opinion behind him, while he made a strong appeal for the nation to relearn to appreciate the value of the lives of the unborn.

12 posted on 12/31/2001 7:35:44 PM PST by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fish out of Water
It's nice to have an Executive running the Executive branch. Now if we could only get some LEGISLATORS in the Sinate instead of Socialist Obstructionists we might get on the road to a Constitutional government.
13 posted on 12/31/2001 7:36:04 PM PST by VRWC For Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hugh Akston
Actions speak louder than words ... particularly from a man who'd use Scripture the book of his favorite philosopher to excuse Death.

He put his our money where his mouth is.

14 posted on 12/31/2001 7:42:30 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - President Bush - 31 times the President is referred to as "Mr." Bush. If they had their druthers.. (other than not mentioning him at all)... they'd probably reference him in the third person, but come on... they've gotta' say "Bush." Otherwise they'd have to say, "The President." Don't you just LOVE it????
15 posted on 12/31/2001 7:45:07 PM PST by gramcam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
Indeed, actions do speak louder than words. And the actions he took, which gave the public more confidence in him while simultaneously moving public opinion on the abortion question 10 points- a huge amount- spoke much louder than the words Dr. Keyes would have loved for Bush to have made.

And no amount of money could buy that. The pro-life movement had spent millions for years trying to move public opinion, to little avail.

16 posted on 12/31/2001 7:45:54 PM PST by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
You do have a way with words! :)

BTW, a Happy New Year to you and yours.

17 posted on 12/31/2001 7:55:22 PM PST by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
notwithstanding the nyt, God bless our leader president bush. God bless the men & women in uniform, and God bless america!
18 posted on 12/31/2001 8:28:52 PM PST by kim r.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugh Akston
And the actions he took, which gave the public more confidence in him while simultaneously moving public opinion on the abortion question 10 points-

Forgive my French, Hugh, but B.F.D.

Do you not understand that "pro-lifer" pro-aborts like the Bush's are only too well aware their "vital" prong of population control has been a tad too successful?

Even Russia's got anti-abortion placards IN THEIR SUBWAY CARS.

All well and good to "reduce abortions" ... especially among the more valuable of the labor force and consumers. The industrialized nations' populations are imploding, for Pete's sake.

But it will be cold day in hell before they actually move to renege on the GOP policy that is legal abortion. Ashcroft made that much clear when he said right of the bat that the overturning of Roe v. Wade was not on Bush's agenda.

He nailed open the most profitable of all window of "non-personhood". What isn't crystal clear about that?

__________

(It's nearly midnight ... Cheers, guy.)

19 posted on 12/31/2001 8:43:33 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Mr. Bush has seized the catastrophe of Sept. 11 to project himself as the commander in chief at the center of the crisis and to reach for new powers.

It's about time.....the absense of any real commander in chief for the previous 8 years is what made the U.S. so vulnerable to these new threats.

20 posted on 12/31/2001 8:44:47 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson