Skip to comments.
Book says China involved in 9-11 attacks -- Beijing used bin Laden to assault U.S., claims author
WorldNetDaily ^
| 12/15/01
| Gordon Thomas
Posted on 12/14/2001 10:34:47 PM PST by spycatcher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 301-311 next last
To: wirestripper
Of course Bush could have obtained a declaration of war against the Taliban in a heartbeat. I read somewhere that Bush wanted to avoid a declaration of war to avoid activating the act of war exclusion clause from insurance policies. Maybe, maybe not. I suspect another reason was that Bush wanted to be able to move against terrorists elsewhere as and when the opportunity presented itself, and it appeared prudent to do so. A declaration of war against just Afghanistan might have hemmed him in. And a declaration of war against something other than a nation, such as Al Quida (sp), I don't think would really be appropriate. I think the constitutional clause is oriented towards governmental entities.
181
posted on
12/15/2001 1:32:42 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Torie
I think you have it right. Bush and congress agreed of this one.
To: Demidog
RE: America as "bully"
I suggest that you contact some REAL victims of some REAL bullies: Afghan women, who have suffered terribly under the Taliban for the past few years. Then ask THEM if they think that the US is being a "bully" in Afghanistan.
To: wirestripper
People with extra can openers, like me, would flood eBay and thereby satisfy the demand. Newlyweds would then be able to plan for the future knowing that pork & beans would still be on the menu when the economy goes belly-up.
To: Demidog
Demi, I gotta go do some things but before I go I wanted to say that the methods the U.S. is using today to wage war have changed dramatically. It is all about limiting the deaths of innocents to the maximum extent within our ability to do so. What a change since Nam and even since the Gulf. To compare what we are doing now to Nam is like black and white. The innocents killed in Nam numbered in the 100,000-250,000 range or more.(difficult to say since the enemy killed many of them) As a vet I still carry the guilt.
Your critical statements therefore are much too harsh and un-justified IMHO.
To: Demidog; sinkspur
And when Americans call Afghani's "Rags" and that using them like toys is "Strategy" and "Excellent"
And this from someone who likes to brag about how he went to seminary and was a heartbeat from the priesthood. Utterly depressing, though to be fair he is no worse than the other wannabe Osamas here.
To: Misterioso
LOL!
To: Poohbah
RE #90: You might also add a possibility #5, he just happened to guess the same thing that someone with an IQ of 75 or above could also guess -- that because the redical Islamic people and the Chinese both hate our guts and want to do us harm, they just might have actually talked to each other.
To: Demidog
Do you deny the fact that the Northern alliance does not want us in their country anymore that the Taliban does?
Not at all. I am very much aware of that fact. And it is troubling.
Not troubling at all. Delightful. I say we give them their wishes and exit the country at once.
To: Zviadist
Demis arguments have been lucid and intelligent. Yours have been confrontational and pointless. I know you can do better.
To: Demidog
And you know that it's true because you yourself said that we have been inordinately carefull not to allow stories abotu civilian casualties to surface. Not because we value those lives but because we loathe the political ramifications. Where did I say that?
There are no stories about civilian casualties because there are few civilian casualties!
The NA is doing the fighting because it's their country. If they had stood aside, you can be sure the U.S. would have put 100,000 troops on the ground.
To: Demidog
And then we'll go attack China. Won't we? War with China won't be like in a Clancy novel. It will be nasty and tremendously destructive. There is also nothing in China that anybody wants. Lose-lose.
To: Zviadist
And this from someone who likes to brag about how he went to seminary and was a heartbeat from the priesthood.I don't "brag" about it; I mentioned it twice in four years.
Utterly depressing, though to be fair he is no worse than the other wannabe Osamas here.
The only Osamas around here are you and Demigod and tex-omar, who want to handle murdering terrorists with kid gloves.
To: Mitchell
It had to do with fermentation tanks as I recall - a technically dual use item (ahem...)
To: sinkspur
Another brain-dead observation. Peacenikspeak.
Concern over the lives of God's creations, particularly the most helpless and vulnerable, is not "peacenikspeak." It is the mark of civilization. Only barbarians cut from the same cloth as those who bombed our innocents would delight in their misfortune.
One of the injured was Noor Mohammed, who had lost both eyes and both arms. Noor, who is somewhere between 10 and 12 years old, told his uncle he heard the sound of an airplane overhead, ran from his room, and did not know what happened next. Asked how he felt, the boy whispered, "I feel cold and I cannot talk." Glasser found other wounded children from families who claimed they had been struck by bombs while in their mud houses.
But then again, I guess he's just a "rag" and deserves to be blown up for nothing.
Comment #196 Removed by Moderator
To: sinkspur
The only Osamas around here are you and Demigod and tex-omar, who want to handle murdering terrorists with kid gloves. False. I want to handle terrorists by unleashing the unpoliticized dogs of constitutional vengeance on them through letters of Marque and reprisal.
197
posted on
12/15/2001 2:20:31 PM PST
by
Demidog
Comment #198 Removed by Moderator
To: Stefan Stackhouse
I suggest that you contact some REAL victims of some REAL bullies: Like the Branch Davidians and Randy Weaver?
199
posted on
12/15/2001 2:24:23 PM PST
by
Demidog
To: Demidog
False. I want to handle terrorists by unleashing the unpoliticized dogs of constitutional vengeance on them through letters of Marque and reprisal.
Amen! Someone finally said it! This would have been the very best way to catch and punish the scumbags who attacked us. It really is simple with M&R: scumbags: dead. Innocents: spared.
But there is much more profit in "nation-building" and securing pipelines through occupation of foreign territory.
Marque and Reprisal would have been the absolutely very best way to go after this human garbage. Yet supporting such an EFFECTIVE way to get rid of this scum makes one a "terrorist" in the eyes of most people here.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 301-311 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson