Skip to comments.
Book says China involved in 9-11 attacks -- Beijing used bin Laden to assault U.S., claims author
WorldNetDaily ^
| 12/15/01
| Gordon Thomas
Posted on 12/14/2001 10:34:47 PM PST by spycatcher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 301-311 next last
To: wirestripper
Do you deny the fact that the Northern alliance does not want us in their country anymore that the Taliban does? Not at all. I am very much aware of that fact. And it is troubling. I know that we'll screw them over once things are all complete. They are not worthy of our respect.
141
posted on
12/15/2001 12:28:58 PM PST
by
Demidog
To: Zviadist
That's ok my friend. I'm sure you will get over it one day. Perhaps you will find a better place to live. ROFLMAO!
To: Demidog
Our actions show a complete disregard for human life.Another brain-dead observation. Peacenikspeak.
Our actions show a disregard for the lives of those who show a disregard for OUR lives.
But, then, that's what war is. Kill the other guy before he kills you.
To: Demidog
"Our actions show a complete disregard for human life."
And that "disregard" would also be shown by the meticulous and consistent efforts to minimize civilian casualties in our campaign? You're getting laughable, dog.
To: Demidog
And when Americans call Afghani's "Rags" and that using them like toys is "Strategy" and "Excellent" they are also obvious. So what should we call people who harbor those who want to see us dead? Honey-pie?
If it makes you feel better, I think you're a pasty-faced white boy.
To: A Navy Vet
And that "disregard" would also be shown by the meticulous and consistent efforts to minimize civilian casualties in our campaign?Facts and reason? No fair!
146
posted on
12/15/2001 12:36:53 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Demidog
I think you are wrong in your belief that we will ignore them a second time. We learned an expensive lesson from the failures of the Clinton admin. They expected the UN would handle it, and dropped the ball. It won't happen again.
To: spycatcher
Very interesting theory. I wouldn't rule this one out. One should look at who actually gained from the 9-11 attacks. A little scrutiny shows that China definitely came out ahead in a bunch of ways. Look at how they've basically vanished off the policy radar scope and became "good guys" after the EP-3 incident etc. There could have been a lot of levels of "involvement" including simply knowing about it in advance and not warning us.
148
posted on
12/15/2001 12:37:34 PM PST
by
pttttt
To: sinkspur
"But, then, that's what war is. Kill the other guy before he kills you."
And while you're at it...do with overwhelming force and with as little damage possible to yourself. Maybe these guys would prefer the old colonial face off ala The Patriot. Now there was brilliant way to fight a war. The side who has 10 left out of 10,000, wins.
To: A Navy Vet
And that "disregard" would also be shown by the meticulous and consistent efforts to minimize civilian casualties in our campaign? We haven't done that. More evidence. Thanks.
150
posted on
12/15/2001 12:42:27 PM PST
by
Demidog
To: sinkspur
Our actions show a disregard for the lives of those who show a disregard for OUR lives. You claim that the Norhern Alliance show disregard for our lives?
151
posted on
12/15/2001 12:43:18 PM PST
by
Demidog
To: mrobison
15 - bttt "You're all missing the obvious conclusion here: We will now reciprocally use Russia to hit China. Why do you think Bush and Putin are such good buddies now? Russia doesn't want to be China. They want to be the USA. Why do you think Bush pushed so hard on the SDI? Because when Russia kicks China down, we'll be safe. "
152
posted on
12/15/2001 12:43:54 PM PST
by
XBob
To: mrobison
It's Gog and Magog time, folks....and eggnog (oh forgive me I could not resist))
To: Demidog
You claim that the Norhern Alliance show disregard for our lives? Nope. We show disregard for the Taliban lives. They are the enemy.
To: Tom Jefferson
if we went to war with china, i think we would starve, because we don't make can openers in this country any more.
155
posted on
12/15/2001 12:47:37 PM PST
by
XBob
To: sinkspur
We're showing disregard for Northern Alliance and Afghani civilian lives and they are not the enemy.
156
posted on
12/15/2001 12:47:54 PM PST
by
Demidog
To: Demidog
LOL! Demigod thinks civilian casualties weren't minimized!
What a surprise!
Think, hoot-man.
If civilian casualties weren't an issue, this war would have been over in two weeks.
To: XBob
You noticed that too! LOL!
To: Demidog
We're showing disregard for Northern Alliance and Afghani civilian lives and they are not the enemy. So you say. There's no proof of that, of course.
Just your mangy opinion.
To: spycatcher
bttt 23-" Don't underestimate though the immense amount of knowledge we gain from "practice wars" beating up on the little guys. Nobody talks about this much but it's a huge tactical advantage when moving on to bigger fish. "
160
posted on
12/15/2001 12:51:03 PM PST
by
XBob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 301-311 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson