Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Book says China involved in 9-11 attacks -- Beijing used bin Laden to assault U.S., claims author
WorldNetDaily ^ | 12/15/01 | Gordon Thomas

Posted on 12/14/2001 10:34:47 PM PST by spycatcher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-311 next last
To: wirestripper
Do you deny the fact that the Northern alliance does not want us in their country anymore that the Taliban does?

Not at all. I am very much aware of that fact. And it is troubling. I know that we'll screw them over once things are all complete. They are not worthy of our respect.

141 posted on 12/15/2001 12:28:58 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Zviadist
That's ok my friend. I'm sure you will get over it one day. Perhaps you will find a better place to live. ROFLMAO!
142 posted on 12/15/2001 12:30:55 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Our actions show a complete disregard for human life.

Another brain-dead observation. Peacenikspeak.

Our actions show a disregard for the lives of those who show a disregard for OUR lives.

But, then, that's what war is. Kill the other guy before he kills you.

143 posted on 12/15/2001 12:31:12 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
"Our actions show a complete disregard for human life."

And that "disregard" would also be shown by the meticulous and consistent efforts to minimize civilian casualties in our campaign? You're getting laughable, dog.

144 posted on 12/15/2001 12:33:17 PM PST by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
And when Americans call Afghani's "Rags" and that using them like toys is "Strategy" and "Excellent" they are also obvious.

So what should we call people who harbor those who want to see us dead? Honey-pie?

If it makes you feel better, I think you're a pasty-faced white boy.

145 posted on 12/15/2001 12:35:44 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
And that "disregard" would also be shown by the meticulous and consistent efforts to minimize civilian casualties in our campaign?

Facts and reason? No fair!

146 posted on 12/15/2001 12:36:53 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
I think you are wrong in your belief that we will ignore them a second time. We learned an expensive lesson from the failures of the Clinton admin. They expected the UN would handle it, and dropped the ball. It won't happen again.
147 posted on 12/15/2001 12:36:56 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
Very interesting theory. I wouldn't rule this one out. One should look at who actually gained from the 9-11 attacks. A little scrutiny shows that China definitely came out ahead in a bunch of ways. Look at how they've basically vanished off the policy radar scope and became "good guys" after the EP-3 incident etc. There could have been a lot of levels of "involvement" including simply knowing about it in advance and not warning us.
148 posted on 12/15/2001 12:37:34 PM PST by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"But, then, that's what war is. Kill the other guy before he kills you."

And while you're at it...do with overwhelming force and with as little damage possible to yourself. Maybe these guys would prefer the old colonial face off ala The Patriot. Now there was brilliant way to fight a war. The side who has 10 left out of 10,000, wins.

149 posted on 12/15/2001 12:40:25 PM PST by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
And that "disregard" would also be shown by the meticulous and consistent efforts to minimize civilian casualties in our campaign?

We haven't done that. More evidence. Thanks.

150 posted on 12/15/2001 12:42:27 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Our actions show a disregard for the lives of those who show a disregard for OUR lives.

You claim that the Norhern Alliance show disregard for our lives?

151 posted on 12/15/2001 12:43:18 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
15 - bttt "You're all missing the obvious conclusion here: We will now reciprocally use Russia to hit China. Why do you think Bush and Putin are such good buddies now? Russia doesn't want to be China. They want to be the USA. Why do you think Bush pushed so hard on the SDI? Because when Russia kicks China down, we'll be safe. "
152 posted on 12/15/2001 12:43:54 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
It's Gog and Magog time, folks....and eggnog  (oh forgive me I could not resist))

153 posted on 12/15/2001 12:45:19 PM PST by Texas Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
You claim that the Norhern Alliance show disregard for our lives?

Nope. We show disregard for the Taliban lives. They are the enemy.

154 posted on 12/15/2001 12:45:21 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Tom Jefferson
if we went to war with china, i think we would starve, because we don't make can openers in this country any more.
155 posted on 12/15/2001 12:47:37 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
We're showing disregard for Northern Alliance and Afghani civilian lives and they are not the enemy.
156 posted on 12/15/2001 12:47:54 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
LOL! Demigod thinks civilian casualties weren't minimized!

What a surprise!

Think, hoot-man.

If civilian casualties weren't an issue, this war would have been over in two weeks.

157 posted on 12/15/2001 12:48:43 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: XBob
You noticed that too! LOL!
158 posted on 12/15/2001 12:48:46 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
We're showing disregard for Northern Alliance and Afghani civilian lives and they are not the enemy.

So you say. There's no proof of that, of course.

Just your mangy opinion.

159 posted on 12/15/2001 12:49:55 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
bttt 23-" Don't underestimate though the immense amount of knowledge we gain from "practice wars" beating up on the little guys. Nobody talks about this much but it's a huge tactical advantage when moving on to bigger fish. "
160 posted on 12/15/2001 12:51:03 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson