Skip to comments.
Look Who Didn't Trust the Feds
Riverfront Times ^
| 10/31/01
| Ray Hartmann
Posted on 11/16/2001 1:07:22 PM PST by gdani
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
11/16/2001 1:07:22 PM PST
by
gdani
To: gdani
That's why I'm so PO'ed at Janet Ashcroft.
I didn't expect this from him.
To: Dan from Michigan
should we be surprised?
meet the new boss...
3
posted on
11/16/2001 1:07:24 PM PST
by
fod
To: gdani
My reply would be that Ashcroft's role has changed. He is now in the A.G. position when earlier he was in the Congressional oversight position. The A.G. is to aggresively go after criminals, he is the dog on the leash. The holder of that leash, Congress, needs to keep him in check, that's their role. When he held the leash, he kept it in check. That is not his role now, his role is to pull the leash to it's limit and to be held back by those now holding the leash.
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: gdani
Isn't it amazing.
The Ashcrofts of this world only seem to be capable of thinking clearly, [or at least giving lip service to a free republic] when they are OUT of power.
6
posted on
11/16/2001 1:07:25 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
My reply would be that Ashcroft's role has changed. He is now in the A.G. position when earlier he was in the Congressional oversight position. The A.G. is to aggresively go after criminals, he is the dog on the leash. The holder of that leash, Congress, needs to keep him in check, that's their role. When he held the leash, he kept it in check. That is not his role now, his role is to pull the leash to it's limit and to be held back by those now holding the leash. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
good one
7
posted on
11/16/2001 1:07:25 PM PST
by
WhiteGuy
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
His 'role' is to protect & defend the constitution.
9
posted on
11/16/2001 1:07:26 PM PST
by
tpaine
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: fod
Now W signs his paycheck, not the people of Missouri.
To: gdani
Three years ago is a lifetime. 9/11 changed everything. Bush and Ashcroft have my full support.
12
posted on
11/16/2001 1:07:26 PM PST
by
adrian
To: Dan from Michigan
His appearance and demeanor have changed substantially since 9/11. I'm pleased with neither.
I think something went to his head, and it wasn't his stylist.
prambo
13
posted on
11/16/2001 1:07:27 PM PST
by
prambo
To: gdani; TwoStep; Native American Female Vet
To quote my bumper sticker: "I love my country. It's the government I don't trust."
To: gdani
From the response I got, I guess most don't understand what the founders understood. The reason there are checks and balances built into the system we have is so that the function of government will be smooth. If everyone's roles were the same, there would be no need for checks and balances. Should your local D.A. act as the public defender's office? Should city council not oversee the police department? There are roles in government and each has it's particular thrust and motivation. Sorry, but that's reality.
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
So, WHO LET THE DOGS OUT?
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Sorry to disagree - but all public servants take an oath to support and defend the Constitution, in effect, this is part of their job description.
Any such servant who exceeds his/her authority, including not abiding by the Constitution, is derelict in their duties and have commited an act of treason.
Yes, TREASON.
Because they in effect are aiding and abetting the enemies of this country when they do not abide by the Constitution.
Does this viewpoint make me a terrorist in Arizona?
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
This is not personal, but I find that argument very weak. He took and oath to uphold and defend the Constitution when he accepted BOTH jobs. From my rocking chair, and considering allegiance to his oath, he was a better Senator than a lawyer.
To: gdani
No surprise here. Ashcroft didn't trust the feds back then because there was a Democrat in the White House. He didn't change his tune on Sept. 11; he changed his tune when his party took over the executive branch (as did most Republicans, for that matter). Foolish and hypocritical, yet common.
19
posted on
11/16/2001 1:13:43 PM PST
by
Sandy
To: Sandy
Perhaps as AG, he understands that the Constitution is a Living Document, subject to the Whims of the Executive Branch as needed to handle the Problems of the Moment.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson