NO SIGNS OF ENGINE FAILURE!

FOX News

[TaZ]

I was talking about AA Flight 191 that crashed in 1979 dummy.....lol!!

[Map Kernow]

I was talking about AA Flight 191 that crashed in 1979 dummy.....lol!!

Don't bust a gut---I was talking about what happened to Fl. 578--I don't give one flying what you dredged up from your hoary past.

[VRWC For Truth]

I've taken 2 round trip flights since Sept 11, one to the Caribbean. I'd fly tomorrow if I had to. I was going to book a flight during December this week, but I'll wait till next week to see if prices go lower. Then, I'll thank you tinfoil hatters for driving the prices of tickets lower. LOL. It's no more safer or less safer to fly since Sept 11. There is and ALWAYS will be risk doing it. However, accident statistics say you'll be more likely to die crossing the street or driving. Someone dies in a car accident every 12 minutes in the US. I don't see planes falling out of the sky anywhere near that rate. Your hysteria borders on Liberal ideals that world has to be safe. The world is a DANGEROUS place and it's about time to get off the couch and face it. If that make you uncomfortable, so be it.

[ScholarWarrior]

here's the list of names

[ScholarWarrior]

Scratch theory #1. Wings intact to impact.
I doubt spontaneous engine separation theory.
We are left with vert stab corrosion sufficient to cause separation
(never happened b4 in aviation history)
or sabotage / bomb.
Thoughts?

[John Jamieson]

Stab was composite, no corrosion, but cleaner failure?

[slym]

Re your comparison to TWA-800, here's a post from "The Reading Room" of www.rumormillnews.com: From: Andrea Ritze
Date: Wed Nov 14, 2001 5:20 am
Subject: AA 587 and TWA 800 on Fox News

Tuesday evening on the Fox News Channel program, "O'Reilly Factor," I watched the segment where Bill O'Reilly interviewed "former NTSB investigator" Vernon Grose. While asking questions about the crash of AA 587, O'Reilly said something to the effect that he hoped that the NTSB would not behave like this was a "cover-up," which was the problem surrounding the investigation of TWA 800.

At O'Reilly's association of the word "cover-up" to TWA 800, Vernon Grose reacted positively to this lead-in, which led to O'Reilly's follow-up question. What did Vernon Grose think about the NTSB's official conclusion on TWA 800.

Grose responded that he had interviewed more people than anyone else who worked on the TWA 800 investigation, and that HE WAS NOT SATISFIED with the NTSB's official conclusion for the cause of the crash.

However, there was only the implication that there was a cover-up in the TWA 800 investigation. Grose was not explicit, and O'Reilly went on to the next point.

NOTE: The "O'Reilly Factor" program will repeat (Tuesday night) Wednesday morning from 4am-5am, EST, on the Fox News Channel.