Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patali: Pilot of AA flight dumped fuel prior to crash, in (likely) response to mechanical failures
Gov. Pataki | 11/12/01 | WABC Radio

Posted on 11/12/2001 12:18:32 PM PST by Steven W.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 361-362 next last
To: jacquej
The most important detail that sticks in my teeny cranium is that as soon as Neil Cavuto on Fox noticed that the stock market was tanking in response to the news, (and this was about 20 minutes after the plane went down), he started the cheerleading for "just a horrible accident, folks, no reason to suspecct anything more"...

I noticed that, too. Then they starting talking about the DOW and economy later on, too.

241 posted on 11/12/2001 2:31:35 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: BlueHorseShoe
I accidentally flipped channels to CNN and can you believe Hillary has her ugly mug on the tube again! She will not go away! I'm so sick and tired and weary of her mug.

Ugh. I was doing the same thing. Some other guy was doing the talking and there she was (looking like hell) woodenly bobbing her head up and down as if in agreement with him. She looked as if she wanted to hog some airtime, but she couldn't get a hold of her speechwriter or she hadn't enough time to rehearse an empty platitude. (Crisis does that to some people.) Unlike Rudy Guilliani, (or her hubby Bubba) Her Heinous appears totally ill at ease unless she and her sychophants are in control of the situation...

242 posted on 11/12/2001 2:32:37 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
Please people give it a rest...

If the pilot didnt radio that he was dumping fuel then we dont know if he dumped the fuel or if the fuel was naturally being dumped as a result of what was happening.

The flight data recorders do not show an intentional dump.

GO AWAY ALL YOU LIBERAL CONSPIRACY SEEKERS!

243 posted on 11/12/2001 2:35:39 PM PST by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zordas
The damage is too extreme to be a simple engine failure.

I take it you've never seen video of an jet engine fail at full throttle. Now there is a hellacious sight!

244 posted on 11/12/2001 2:37:28 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: jacquej
I am so depressed tonight that even this administration can't tell us the straight truth that I could just spit.

I'm a Libertarian and hence powerfully opposed to big government, but these conspiracy nuts are just profoundly unAmerican. They are defeatists of the first order, and their effect is to produce the feelings of defeatism in people like you.

245 posted on 11/12/2001 2:39:49 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: bootless
regarding the aibus fuel dump:


Under emergency conditions also, fuel dump [to reach more or less Max Landing Weight fuel levels] needs to be closely monitored. This can normally be achieved electrically by the FMS software, but it fails once electrics are monitored off [no power to jettison circuit’s bus, and possibly also to all fuel gauges].

A mechanical device [auto-closing, float-operated dump valve] needs to be installed to stop unattended dumping once it reaches specific minimum fuel level. In some a/c it is easy to start jettison early in the checklist [then forget about it and perhaps the auto-shutoff will be electrically disabled by completing the checklist – leading to fuel shortage]. This may not have been a factor with SR111 but it is apparent that Smk/Elec/Air Switch position 2/3 OFF disables the Fuel Dump (auto low-level shut-off).


http://www.justplanes.com/AirlineNews_000201.html
An Airbus A340 en route from Sydney to Buenos Aires was forced to dump fuel and make an emergency landing at Auckland International this weekend due to engine problems.

246 posted on 11/12/2001 2:45:10 PM PST by KneelBeforeZod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Zordas
How can an aircraft lose it's rudder in flight and two engines???

Consider a light airplane. In one case a wooden prop delaminated on one blade. The imbalance caused the engine to tear from its bolts and fall off the plane. The change in center of gravity caused the plane to leaf backwards undergoing terrible aerodynamic strain until the wings ripped off. The plane landed in bits and pieces -- all because a little glue in the prop gave way.

Now mulitply the force a thousand times for a jet engine.

247 posted on 11/12/2001 2:45:22 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

Comment #248 Removed by Moderator

To: jlogajan
Hey, guys. Just a little fact to interject here. The A-300 flight manual says there's no provision for jettisoning (dumping) fuel.
249 posted on 11/12/2001 2:53:59 PM PST by Crimson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Crimson
The A-300 flight manual says there's no provision for jettisoning (dumping) fuel.

What page?

250 posted on 11/12/2001 3:01:59 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
No. If I recall, the American flight in Chicago was a DC-10 that popped a blade in the turbofan on the tail engine, slicing through the rudder and the horizontal stabilizer.
1. No tail engine for the A-300.
2. Tail picture appears intact when fished from the Bay.

I thought catastrophic engine failure too until I saw the tail.
Looks like bomb in the tail or mechanical sabotage.

Time to round 'em up on the Ponderosa.

251 posted on 11/12/2001 3:04:07 PM PST by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
Pataki is an idiot
252 posted on 11/12/2001 3:07:17 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScholarWarrior
Thank you...I thought I was being a bit paranoid...but will somebody please explain how an entire vertical stabilizer comes off the jet intact before impact ???

I hope this doesn't go the way of Flight 800...

253 posted on 11/12/2001 3:11:42 PM PST by Basilides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
My anger and then depression wasn't fueled by anything I read here, but by the spin I witnessed today on Fox news, all day long, until I couldn't take it anymore.

I quit watching in disgust around 4:00, took a nap then got up and decided to post here, and didn't read much before posting.

So, "they"- Fox news and the "experts" they had on all day to convince me that this was an accident are what is getting me down...

One "expert" was even trying to dispute the bomb theory by saying that they match the baggage to the passenger, and he seemed to think that was convincing evidence that there couldn't possibly have been a bomb on board.

This kind of crap is what really pisses me off. Even an 8 year old could spot that statement as illogical nonsense.

254 posted on 11/12/2001 3:13:07 PM PST by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
Pataki...the dumbest Republican ever. A four minute flight and the pilot was dumping fuel?
255 posted on 11/12/2001 3:16:48 PM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
Having been a passenger on a plane which dumped its fuel, there is NO WAY this pilot had a chance to do it. Dumping takes forever.

One theory is that the fuel tank was punctured by an explosion and fuel spewed into Jamaica Bay.

The relatively small fire at the impact point does suggest less than full tanks and fuel may have been found in the Bay.

256 posted on 11/12/2001 3:19:41 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: in the Arena
Give me a break. I am one of the most ardent RKBA supporters on FR, but it does no one any good to apply selective ignorance to very real possibilities.

A head on shot at a 12' circular target coming straight at the shooter at under 2,000 yards would not be hard to accomplish.

I doubt this caused today's crash, but it could cause tomorrow's. My solution has nothing to do with gun control, but the moving of our NG troops from inside the terminals to the approaches.

257 posted on 11/12/2001 3:20:35 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: ikka
Gotcha. I do recall the "anti tank 50 calibers", I was thrown by the context of your remarks.
258 posted on 11/12/2001 3:22:05 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

Comment #259 Removed by Moderator

To: Basilides
Another thread quotes Fox 5 in NY interview with a Kenneth Brown on a boat in Jamaica Bay.
Eyewitness who helped recover the tail.
He said there was an explosion on the left side of the airplane which tore the wing off.
Wing hits tail and tears it off intact.
Plane, in 6 seconds goes belly up into Rockaway, with other engine still turning.

I'm leaning more bomb than either sabotage or cat. engine failure.

260 posted on 11/12/2001 3:23:22 PM PST by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 361-362 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson