Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Inside Look at State Department Staffing
Inside information from someone who's been there ^ | 10 November 2001 | A Foreign Service Candidate invited to Washington, D.C.

Posted on 11/10/2001 12:48:56 AM PST by Rubber Duckie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 11/10/2001 12:48:56 AM PST by Rubber Duckie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rubber Duckie
Wow! What an interesting narrative about our (suspected) sad state of affairs. I imagine that many left-leaners and clintonites are still in key positions in our government. Eight years of inundation must be difficult and time consuming to correct; but, I have faith this will eventually be rectified by the Bush Administration. Our President certainly has his hands full. Thank you for sharing this with us.
2 posted on 11/10/2001 1:25:24 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rubber Duckie
Thanks for the informative story, sir.

I remember thinking about the Foreign Service, and still do, at times, but your story gives me unfortunate insight into something I suspected long ago--those that claim to represent us, merely represent the same enemy lib/conservs fight here on American soil.

I registered for the test a few years ago, and couldn't get a ride out to Detroit(from Ann Arbor), so nothing then. The next year I waited and waited for a response, only to find out that a piece of what I thought was junk mail had my ticket for the exam room. I suppose that's my fault, but the envelope could have been more official in appearance.

I only saw practice questions, but they seemed fairly easy if one keeps up with the news at all. The thing that frightens me, is that we have Ivy League snobs, with all their prejudices, alleging to represent the US. If we can't clear out the stench of left-wing/liberal statism from the State Dept, it won't matter who's in the White House.

3 posted on 11/10/2001 1:27:48 AM PST by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
Obviously, the test had some relavance as I would suspect that thousands take the test, but only hundreds get invited to the oral portion. In my case, 20 odd people at a U.S. consulate overseas narrowed down to an even dozen in D.C.

What bothered me was not only the superficiality of the questions at the dog and pony show but the fact that they seemed to have their minds made up before the evaluation was over. One would think the type of questions in the second stage would be more difficult than in the first stage, but not so.

With all due respect, there seems to be a handful of highly competent people who make it through the politically correct net, but I'd bet the biggest share of them do it on the veteran's quota.

4 posted on 11/10/2001 1:38:48 AM PST by Rubber Duckie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rubber Duckie
I've been in interview rounds similar to that. They'll call you in because HR has to make everyone think it has "candidates" because 1)that sounds so much more official 2)they have to appear to give the organization input into the decision, despite the fact they have their choice in mind by that point.

What I also find entertaining is how those in the public sector create barriers to employment, when that is usually one of their complaints about the "dispossessed." So, they'll turn away teachers who KNOW chemistry well, because that person doesn't have a certificate, and despite the fact that there's no correlation between teaching ability and certification.

The State Department needs knowledgeable, intelligent and professional people with the needs of America foremost on their mind, but instead they'll take anyone with a degree who spouts the same CFR-type nonsense. I swear, the answer is so simple sometimes, and yet politicians and bureaucrats like to talk their way out of that solution 9 times out of 10.

5 posted on 11/10/2001 1:49:25 AM PST by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rubber Duckie
I will vouch for everything you've written. I'm with the Dept. of Defense and have worked in our consulates/embassies in Munich, Athens, Caracas, Tegucigalpa and Mexico City during 2 to 3 years tours. I've done short-term work ("TDYs") in probably another six or seven embassies; I have met hundreds of State Department careerists. I could count on the fingers of one hand those State Department careerists who would be worth the powder it would take to blow them up - the vast, vast majority are not only liberal but EXTREMELY liberal. I wouldn't mind this too much if I saw some integrity mixed with their ideology, instead I have found the vast majority to be corrupt (spiritually and ethically); many believe themselves to be "above the law" and as far as plain ability goes I have found the vast majority to be either completly inept or incompetent. In my opinion, the only way to repair the State Dept. would be to fire EVERY SINGLE EMPLOYEE and start over. Very, very few in the State Dept. have what we think of as "real world" skills; most have come right from Academia (though there are some "direct hires" who were recruited from various major city "management teams", which means they come with major political connections). It is both disgusting and frightening to think that these people are representing (forget about defending) America.
6 posted on 11/10/2001 3:39:47 AM PST by waxhaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rubber Duckie
I'll quickly pass on a very true anecdote which I think accurately reflects the all-to-common mindset of those in our State Dept. At the Marine Corps Ball two years ago, the U.S. Ambassador to Mexico, Jeffrey Davidow, felt it was necessary to APOLOGIZE to the Mexican guests at this ball for the words in the Marine Corp hymn... the part which goes "From the halls of Montezuma..." Davidow is a careerist and prior to his assignment here in Mexico he was Undersecretary of State for Latin America. This is the kind of people our nation has representing us. Unfortunately he was also our ambassador in Caracas while I was stationed there and I used to shake my head in dismay/wonder at his unbelievable policies. I long ago came to the conlusion that Davidow doesn't really work for American citizens but for the World Bank... and sure enough, a few months ago he told the Mexican government that the time has come for them to surrender their sovereignty and go the WB for a loan. (When Bush entered office I thought that Davidow's continuance here as ambassador would be an indicator of Bush's own agenda. Davidow is still ambassador and the globalist agenda continues.)
7 posted on 11/10/2001 3:50:54 AM PST by waxhaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waxhaw
I've known a handful of people who have worked in the Foreign Service. What is posted here is not only consistent with what I've been told, but also consistent in what I've experienced working abroad.
8 posted on 11/10/2001 4:21:33 AM PST by Rubber Duckie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: waxhaw
I'm just curious. WWhat percentage of state department employees do you actually think are representing American interests? I'd suspect it is pretty close to the veteran's quota.
9 posted on 11/10/2001 5:44:37 AM PST by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: infowars; OKCSubmariner; Registered
FBI says State housing spies posing as reporters

Powell Shocker: Calls Palestinian Suicide Bombers 'Innocents'

Powell says U.S. won't brand Arafat a terrorist because he's useful to peace process

The State Department criticizes Israel for targeting suspected Palestinian terrorists for execution

The United States State Department believes the "17 or so dead sailors" on the U.S.S. Cole "does not compare to the 100+ Palestinians who have died in recent weeks" in Mideast violence, a stunning government memo reveals.

"the State Department has no position on rock throwing. It could be considered a philosophical question"

Israel and the US State Department

STATE DEPARTMENT ARABISTS STRIKE AGAIN

State Department Confusion over Liberty

Spy suspect 'a key player' at State Department

DEPARTMENT OF STATE PUBLICATION 7277
Note: Arms agency being absorbed by the State Department

Powell Praises Castro

Powell: Castro Has 'Done Some Good Things For His People'

Cuba, Once Again, Classified as State Sponsor of International Terrorism By State Department Report

Castro Praises Colin Powell

US Has Given 50,000 Visas Since 9-11 To New Visitors From the Middle East

U.S. Encourages Immigration From Terror-Sponsor States

Human Events
By Joseph A. D'Agostino
The Week of October 1, 2001

The U.S. State Department runs a quota system designed to encourage immigration from all seven countries on the department’s own terrorist watch list.

The "Diversity Immigrant Visa Program" has the goal of issuing highly prized permanent residence visas to 50,000 foreign nationals from countries that send relatively few immigrants to the United States. These visas are specifically designed to increase the diversity of the U.S. immigrant pool and are in addition to the employment- and family-based permanent visas that are granted each year.

All seven of the nations listed by the State Department as "state sponsors of international terrorism"—Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Sudan—are included in the program. "This was a program created by Congress," said a State Department official, and "1995 was the first year we had it."

Section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which requires the State Department to run the program, was sponsored by Sen. Teddy Kennedy (D.-Mass.) in 1990 and signed into law by President George Bush.

Countries that have sent 50,000 or more immigrants to the United States in the last five years, such as Britain, Canada, mainland China, Colombia, El Salvador, Mexico, Pakistan, and the Philippines, are excluded from the program.

Applicants to the diversity program "still have to meet the same requirements as other applicants for permanent residence visas," a State Department official said. "Those requirements include copies of police records, interviews."

The application requirements, the official said, enable State to screen out dangerous people such as terrorists. "No one country may have more than 7% of the visas, but there is no minimum," she said. "No country is guaranteed to be able to have applicants approved under this program." Applicants enter a lottery each year, she said. Requirements include a high school diploma or a history of skilled work experience.

Thirteen million people filed applications for the 50,000 slots available next year. Of these, three million applications were ruled invalid. Of the ten million remaining, 1,703 people from Iran were awarded visas, 117 from Iraq, 67 from Syria, 26 from Libya, 757 from Cuba, none from North Korea, and 1,820 from Sudan.

Rep. Tom Tancredo (R.-Colo.), chairman of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus, had already introduced legislation to abolish the program before the September 11 attacks. Now he says he will include its abolition in the immigration reform package he plans to introduce after the House has passed the President’s anti-terrorism package. He said he expects that it will be difficult to get this reform package to the House floor.

Jack Martin, special projects director for the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), said he doubts that terrorists use the diversity immigrant visa program because obtaining permanent residence visas is such a long process that includes a more thorough background check than that involved in getting a temporary visa (for business, tourism, or study).

© Human Events, 2001

7,000 Men Recently Entered from Al Qaeda 'Watch' Countries - Between late October and December 1, the State Department granted nonimmigrant U.S. visas to at least 7,000 men from countries in which al Qaeda is active.

Let's repeat that. "After" the World Trade Center attack. "Between late October and December 1, the State Department granted nonimmigrant U.S. visas to at least 7,000 men from countries in which al Qaeda is active."

The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) says it has no plans to round up the 250,000 to 300,000 illegal aliens that it admits are still in the country even though they have already been ordered deported by federal judges - October 22, 2001

Preparing for The Next Pearl Harbor Attack (re: Homeland Security)

POLICE STATE


DIVERSITY IS OUR STRENGTH

While terrorists plotted, CIA officers were making "diversity quilts"

The Origins of Political Correctness
"We call it "Political Correctness." The name originated as something of a joke, literally in a comic strip, and we tend still to think of it as only half-serious. In fact, it’s deadly serious. It is the great disease of our century, the disease that has left tens of millions of people dead in Europe, in Russia, in China, indeed around the world. It is the disease of ideology. PC is not funny. PC is deadly serious.

If we look at it analytically, if we look at it historically, we quickly find out exactly what it is. Political Correctness is cultural Marxism. It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. It is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace movement, but back to World War I. If we compare the basic tenets of Political Correctness with classical Marxism the parallels are very obvious."

Joe McCarthy Was Right - Communists in the State Department

Sen. Joseph McCarthy Was Not Only Right, He Was an American Hero

10 posted on 04/14/2002 11:05:10 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: waxhaw
This is not just the State Dept but the entire Clinton federal Gov't complex.

About six years ago the military couldn't call Christmas Christmas and had to call it "holidays". Easter was changed to "spring Vacation" and Thanksgiving was called "Fall Harvest".

No freeking Bull !

It's back to normal now since Bush was elected but the State Dept. is probably still mostly Clinton's State Dept. so it will take years to weed them out !

11 posted on 04/14/2002 11:14:39 PM PDT by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rubber Duckie
What a great story and thread. Thanks for writing and posting it. Colin Powell seems to work well within this milieu. This article sheds light on his current jaunt around the MidEast. Its peculiar sidling up to dictators and defense of "oppressed" masses.
12 posted on 04/14/2002 11:34:50 PM PDT by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Uncle Bill,MizSterious,Wallaby,Fred Mertz,rdavis84,thinden,aristeides,Donald Stone,lawdog,archy,b
The info in Uncle Bill's reply #13 is magnificient and spectacular. It explains the insane policies coming out of Powell and the State Department lately. Even William Safire and Rush Limbaugh have been recently getting very strong in their public complaints about twisted State Department policies.
14 posted on 04/15/2002 1:33:49 AM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill,MizSterious,Wallaby,Fred Mertz,rdavis84,thinden,aristeides,Donald Stone,lawdog,archy,b
The info in Uncle Bill's reply #10 is magnificient and spectacular. It explains the insane policies coming out of Powell and the State Department lately. Even William Safire and Rush Limbaugh have been recently getting very strong in their public complaints about twisted State Department policies.
15 posted on 04/15/2002 1:34:51 AM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
You've Got Mail
Source: NARA

"The number of Russian intelligence operatives working here officially in the United States has not gone down since the Cold War," - John Millis
NOTE: INSIGHT - The Strange Death of John Millis

Russian spies in U.S. up 40% -

State Department Saddamists
Insight Magazine

Russia Sends Arafat Backing for Palestinian State

Iraq: Russia Gets Priority for Oil

Spy suspect 'a key player' at State Department

Shortly before his arrest, Hanssen was moved to FBI headquarters from a post at the State Department’s Office of Foreign Missions (OFM).

What's known about the case so far is that Hanssen worked for the FBI for 27 years, most of that time in counterintelligence. The last four years he worked at the State Department, where an electronic "bug" was found in a conference room, enabling a Russian agent to monitor meetings from a car nearby.

Arafat Murdered U.S. Diplomats
"The evidence includes highly classified intercepts of Arafat’s verbal orders to the killers and has been suppressed for years by the State Department."

Fixing a Photo to Fit a Policy

Castro's Planes Fly Over U.S. Despite Terrorist Ties
"When presented with the above examples of Castro’s hate-America drive, all Secretary of State Colin Powell could say was that he was "not familiar” with most of them."

Chinese Germ Warfare Ignored by State Department

16 posted on 04/15/2002 4:30:40 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rubber Duckie
What bothered me was not only the superficiality of the questions at the dog and pony show but the fact that they seemed to have their minds made up before the evaluation was over.

In situations like this, they are not so much qualifying applicants as they are disqualifying them. As you say, the applicants in the room were all more or less qualified, so what they are looking for is the answer or attitude that disqualifies an applicant. That's why the consideration interval was so short -- they just find a single (or maybe a second confirming) reason to reject rather than weighing reasons (evaluating strengths and weaknesses) to accept.

17 posted on 04/15/2002 5:00:55 AM PDT by Anthem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rubber Duckie

"...Again, we couldn't find much diversity--unless one counts M&M's style diversity (different colors outside, same content inside)..."


"... What few examiners were not from Ivy League colleges, were either from those one tier removed in the northeast or former journalists who had worked in various foreign countries (more than a few of these likely naturalized citizens judging from their names and birthplaces). There was one--exactly one--examiner in the profile pages who had worked in private industry outside journalism--he had a brief stint in the Peace Corps (which was not uncommon on other profiles) and then a couple of years teaching English in Japan..."


18 posted on 04/15/2002 5:36:48 AM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waxhaw
--and some folks here when thery comment that it appears outside strange groups are running the government- like the CFR/Trilats and this world bank IMF and etc. - get dismised. But then we get direct info like this and from the originating poster that confirms it more.

Thanks for the insight.

19 posted on 04/15/2002 6:04:05 AM PDT by zog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rubber Duckie
The interview process sounds similar to some corporate interviews I've been party to. Initial qualifications are set as a baseline "cut". Then up the chain to the oral part of the process. Which is used for the employer to get a feel about how a person interacts with others. I'd imagine the little "I pointed out that among the countries in Asia which most consistently supported American interests, one (Singapore) was not particularly democratic and two (Japan and Korea) were not particularly diverse, smiling when I said it." quip doomed him if he wasn't already. The oral part is always geared towards picking the best fit for the group that has the open position. I can tell you that the same kind of PC cream-o-croppin' goes on all the time and that the best qualified is usually the one with the strongest attitude. So the job ends up in a lesser, yet more amiable, candidate. Why would the State Dept be any different?

EBUCK

20 posted on 07/15/2002 6:36:15 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson