Justice Department won't let (FBI) agent testify (in Nichol's state trial)

Indianapolis Star ^ | November 3, 2001 | JAMES PATTERSON

[EarlyBird]

A clue for you is that Bush replaced few if any significant Fed bureaucrats and officials that were Clintonistas. Tell me why that is? Do You at least agree that Clinton and the Clintonistas coveredup many scandals including Waco and OKC and Chinagate, and Filegate, and Whitewater and Monica gate and , and , .....?If you agree with this then maybe you can understand why things are not being cleaned up under Bush by the Clintonitas that are still there that created the messes and coverups anyway. no reason why Bush would continue Clinton's legacy.

Of course Bush has to deal with some people of the Clinton era. Do you really believe that any incoming president can immediately clear all remnants of the previous administration, especially when the previous administration ran 8 years?

What do you want Bush to do? Conduct a Stalin purge of the entire executive branch in the middle of a war, and let it be without leadership at this critical time?

Please.

[OKCSubmariner]

From reply #29 for reply #40:

"I was actually being kind to Mueller and ASchcroft in my remarks by saying they are tring to protect institutions-I was giving them the benefit of the doubt. Actually IMO they are both stupid and corrupt for not carrying out the laws of the land regardless of WHY"

[max61]

Why are you foolish enough to believe that the current administration has any power over the bureaucratic colossus that is the Federal government?. Do you really believe that the Bush administration would expose any type of criminal wrongdoing on the part of the previous adminstration??. When have you ever seen the government going after their own?. It never happens. The first rule of government is self preservation.

---max

[rightofrush]

Now, you are sounding like a fanatic. Until you can give me a convincing argument as to why the Bushes would allow Reno to get away with this, when they are running a political campaign against her in FLA, I will disregard your posts.

Wheels within wheels. The success of those who would do the constitution ill is measured by those who still buy into Bushie BS.

[marajade]

If that were true Mark Fuhrman would be dead.

[EarlyBird]

But if the track record is any indicator, I'd bet that this thread will just whither and die.

Well, you've got one thing right at least.

[marajade]

Have you ever heard of the word "appeal"?

Terry Nichol's has the right to appeal the decision if he doesn't like it.

[OKCSubmariner]

For reply #41.

Bush is taking way too long to replace the Clintonistas in the Fed bureaucracy. He has replaced very few. BUsh has had more than enough time to find plenty of well qualified conservative Republicans to replace the Clinton Bozos. Please, Please do not expect me to believe otherwise, I won't buy the excuses.

I expected and voted for much more, much better, much sooner to be done with dignity and legally and in good taste so the "poor Clintonitas" won't feel they were unfairly purged. Removal and replacement does not require "left wing political corectness" however.

[rightofrush]

Thank you for the explanion. You had me wondering, but I guess that you're just a much nicer and kinder person than me.

[MizSterious]

I pray that these posts will be allowed to remain here on Free Republic. I further pray that people will not only read them, but read what they imply to a free republic. Thanks to all those who are revealing the truth, despite the catcalls from the shills, and despite constant criticism from even the management here--this story is huge, but can it ultimately be buried? Only if people permit it to be.

[EarlyBird]

Why are you foolish enough to believe that the current administration has any power over the bureaucratic colossus that is the Federal government?. Do you really believe that the Bush administration would expose any type of criminal wrongdoing on the part of the previous adminstration??. When have you ever seen the government going after their own?. It never happens. The first rule of government is self preservation.

I just don't believe the Bush administration is going to continue to play that game. If you do, then you have no hope. But I have hope.

[marajade]

"Bush is taking way too long to replace the Clintonistas in the Fed bureaucracy."

And why is that? Because the Senate refuses to put him nominees up for advise and consent in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Its not Bush's fault that that is so.

[EarlyBird]

One is a fool to not accept that as being possible.

One is an idiot to write such an idiosyncratic statement.

[freekitty]

I agree with you.....

[rightofrush]

One is a fool to not accept that as being possible.

See my #34. (collapse=colapse)

[MizSterious]

The evidence is overwhelming, EarlyBird. Go to the archives, and search on OKCSubmariner's articles. All of them are extremely well-researched. Those of us who live here heard the APBs put out on the scanners regarding middle eastern males fleeing in a brown truck, just for instance. The fact remains: if the Reno justice dept. had done their job instead of hindering local and national law enforcement, September 11th might not have happened. Some of the same people were involved in both. (Clue--McVeigh was only one among many, perhaps at least a dozen "John Does.")

[Twodees]

The FBI has always been that way, especially when Hoover was still alive and in charge. It's a secret police force like the Gestapo or Tontons Macoutes. "Crimebusting" has never been its prime focus, and what criminal work it does is totally dependent on snitches and fabricated evidence.

The FBI is and always has been the Executive's tool for political use.