Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N. rights chief brands attacks "crimes of (Against) humanity"
Reuters | 9/25/01 | Stephanie Nebehay

Posted on 09/25/2001 11:27:49 AM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 09/25/2001 11:27:49 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Who cares what the UN thinks? They can't stand being put in their place and ignored.

Phuque the UN.

prambo

2 posted on 09/25/2001 11:31:04 AM PDT by prambo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Thanks for posting this, but I stopped caring what anyone at the United Nations thought a long, long time ago.

Eff them all.

3 posted on 09/25/2001 11:31:25 AM PDT by George Smiley (george.smiley@lycos.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Thanks, but no thanks. All murder is a crime against humanity. Another term for "hate crime". This was an act of war against the United States. Don't want to be any more obligated to them than we already are. Payback's a bitch.

as if anyone asked my opinion :-}

4 posted on 09/25/2001 11:31:35 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The recent "World Conference Against Whitey" Moslem hate-fest in Durban may have brought Mary Robinson around a bit.
5 posted on 09/25/2001 11:32:46 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all
It will be interesting to see what the response is to this from all of the countries who put much stock in the UN, when it comes to bashing the US that is.
6 posted on 09/25/2001 11:34:37 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Feeling a bit left out after all those efforts to appease and negotiate with the Taliban, are they?

to recognise the suicide attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon as "crimes against humanity".

Is there a talking point running around the leftist groups saying that the phrase terrorist attack must be replaced by suicide attack? The terrorists as victims? GRRR!

7 posted on 09/25/2001 11:34:43 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prambo
Well, sure, but stuff like this does help us in the propaganda war. It echoes President Bush's speech comparing Al Qaeda to Fascists and Nazis and totalitarians. It also gives notice to the Islamic states that have been using the UN as their anti-semitic and anti-American playground lately that there is some terrorism that even the UN will not make excuses for.
8 posted on 09/25/2001 11:36:17 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ratcat, backhoe, t-shirt, Libertina, B4Ranch, ppaul
FYI (Deport the UN)
9 posted on 09/25/2001 11:36:37 AM PDT by TrueBeliever9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"crimes against humanity".

I hate that term.

10 posted on 09/25/2001 11:38:33 AM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Is there a talking point running around the leftist groups saying that the phrase terrorist attack must be replaced by suicide attack? The terrorists as victims? GRRR!

This is indicative of Reuters' decision to stop using the word "terrorist" to describe the September 11 atrocities. The head of Reuters even said that "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter." Notice that in this article the only use of the word "terrorist" is in quotes from Mary Robinson.

11 posted on 09/25/2001 11:39:12 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
Commentary: Avoiding the word "terrorist"
12 posted on 09/25/2001 11:41:45 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The International Criminal Court, which Robinson hopes will be set up in 12-18 months, says that crimes against humanity include the deliberate targeting of civilians." I think this is the key, here. They're determined to push their leftist agenda on us one way or the other. I guess this is where the political leaders tell the sheeple , 'You see, we need the IC for future terrorists to be brought to international justice.'
13 posted on 09/25/2001 11:43:16 AM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Who cares what they have to say. We're not even on the Human Rights Commission anymore, remember?
14 posted on 09/25/2001 11:44:05 AM PDT by arkfreepdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UN_list

Indexing for the UN_list. Click Mary Robinson's mug to see the list.

15 posted on 09/25/2001 11:47:31 AM PDT by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
U.N ...laying groundwork for International Court as{" result of horrible terrorist attacks"}
16 posted on 09/25/2001 11:55:35 AM PDT by freedomnews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: arkfreepdom
It would be real interesting to know how many of those who made the most noise either in opposing the US on the commission or in ragging on us for leaving the Durban conference had foreknowledge or expectations that the 9/11 murders were to take place.
Participants in the Durban conference barely had time to unpack before the towers were attacked. ...How many of them will find themselves on the "supports terrorism" list?
17 posted on 09/25/2001 11:56:16 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Sounds like the UN just realized that the train left the station without them.
18 posted on 09/25/2001 12:01:27 PM PDT by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
That's it exactly. By defining this as a crime against humanity, rather than an act of war, they're trying to grab the reins from the US and push their antisovereignty agenda.
19 posted on 09/25/2001 12:16:53 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kaylar
If Dubya lets them get away with anything - even the eensiest little smidgen - he can kiss my vote goodbye in 2004.

The UN is part of the problem and, ergo, should have nothing to do with the solution. Unless "involvement" is defined as absorbing a couple of ArcLight strikes.

prambo

20 posted on 09/25/2001 12:24:17 PM PDT by prambo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson