Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unfree Republic
Lew Rockwell ^ | 9/24/01 | Jeff Elkins

Posted on 09/24/2001 3:10:00 AM PDT by Ada Coddington

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 501-503 next last
To: Inspector Harry Callahan
For someone who loathes the "concentration camp" atmosphere that FR has supposedly acquired, how can you account for the fact that you are always here? You really are free to go and start your own "anything goes" forum. But you'd rather crash here and eat Jim's pizza and drink his beer and complain that you just don't feel free.

If FR is a "jail," you are its town drunk, Otis.

441 posted on 09/24/2001 8:22:06 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
Arator was given a "time out" for questioning the hypocrisy of America's foreign policy. He was then permanently banished for questioning his timeout.

Regards dude. An email once in a while wouldn't kill you.

442 posted on 09/24/2001 8:24:49 PM PDT by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
I imagine my screen name will get banned as well.
443 posted on 09/24/2001 8:29:02 PM PDT by NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson, Ada Coddington, All
Jim and all,

The last two weeks have been very trying for everyone not only here at FR but across the country (and in other parts of the world), of course.

My personal observation is that a good deal of the hostility which arises frequently has been due to the belief of many well-meaning conservatives, Republicans in particular, that virtually all of our ills can be laid at the foot of Clinton's two terms. Though FR certainly carries its share of debate on prior events -- most particularly the War Between the States -- there is a genuinely myopic view which is bolstered by the popularity of several other sites that capitalized on strong anti-Clinton sentiment for the last five years or so.

Having met more than a few drug warriors here, I'm quite aware that the traditional wisdom completely fails to acknowledge the part the US and certain allies have played over the last 50+ years in the problems that plague us today. And this includes what we are now calling fanatical fundamental Islamic terrorism.

I have seen some of the most admirable people, JimRob included, who are willing to cut off all sense of history in order to preserve the ideal that we have been unjustly attacked. Of course civilian casualties are a horror. But civilians by the millions have suffered during the last 5 decades and more outside of our shores and all too often because of our policies. Not the least, the manner in which Bolshevik revolution was received and supported up to sometime after WWII -- when a Cold War became the preferable dogma.

To enumerate those who've suffered -- from Asia to the Mid East to the Balkans to South/Central America and more -- would never suffice for the die-hard denier. To reiterate the drug and human trafficking which flourished in tandem with our "allies"; the covert funding, training, supplying of weapons which killed others before being turned on us; to recount the human torture carried out by our "partners"; not to mention the human experiments and psychological operations conducted here within our own boundaries ... well, I perfectly well understand why so few of us want to retrospect and would prefer to genuflect to the flag and the holy offices it apparently represents.

Problem is, that's not only blasphemous but a might big assumption by this time. Yeah, I can see why long ago America appeared to be favored by God. Not sure that's the case anymore. The "shining city on a hill" is a nice appeal but the reality is that there has been a lot of dirty work as well. There is a heck of a lot of unrighteousness here with US, and it has spread tentacles throughout the world.

In simplistic terms, the 9-11 attacks have been characterized as a no-brainer: these guys hate us pure and simple because we're good, we're better, we're world-winners and they're nothing but trashy losers seduced by a religious view that ought to be stamped out. Well, it seems to me that there's a lot to question about that equation, and I'm certainly not pro-Islamic per se. Neither am I in favor of apocalypse (holy war-crusade) that threatens much of the earth's population today in order to magically produce some world order that has its roots in neo-mystical beliefs not all that dissimilar to Hitler's Third Reich. First of all, by this time, I'm not entirely sure the US is favored in this game -- and I do mean, GAME.

Do you understand how many terrorists have been created by the US and Britain (even Paris); harbored by them; funded by them; touted by them; protected by them. What about terrorists and murderers who have fled to Israel, which won't extradite them? Or the Jewish terrorists here in the US that somehow got off on technicalities. (And no, they aren't the *only* ones, but the point is that anti-terrorism has never been a serious goal -- just as the drug war has never been serious or most other "policy" that makes problems bigger than they were). So obviously the pap from D.C. is out of one side of the mouth ... again.

Are we on the verge of the Fourth Reich? Only time will tell. But in the meantime, let's please not Rush to judgment when we don't have all the facts.

Whoever planned and carried out the 9-11 undoubtedly deserves punishment. However, they are still puppets to global agendas. It's amazing how that gets lost in the anger on all sides. If you (generically speaking) aren't interested and willing to discover how we became the Great Satan, then there is a scripture to recall: woe to you. Hubris is always unbecoming, no matter what god it appeals to.

I do agree that loose lips sink ships and have no idea why anyone would post strategic information.

444 posted on 09/24/2001 9:44:45 PM PDT by SelfGov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"Well, our nation is under attack by foreign powers. What do you suggest? Letting them bomb our cities at will? Murder our citizens by the thousands? Gonna turn the other cheek? Gonna negotiate with terrorists? Going to appease the cold-blooded murderers? Join the Peaceniks? Protest against your own country during wartime? Ally with Hanoi Jane? Dodge the draft? Run off to Candada? Collaborate with the enemy? Commit treason? We are at war and like the man said, you are either with US or with them. Which will it be? "

I had always thought of you as a fair man who stood back at a distance to analyze a situation and then come up with a thoughtful and reasoned response. For some reason there are many here who can not separate the Idea of Anti-war from the Idea of being Anti-Socialist. How does this help us win this war against these terrorists ? Sure we can throw away everything FR ever was in the war effort, but what does that do for the country ? In this day and age there is one thing for certain. Once you lose a freedom, or a right...You will not get it back. Not ever! The socialists are licking their lips at what they are going to get accomplished in the name of Protecting us from these terrorists. Few if any of those administrative attacks against our freedoms will make the slightest bit of difference to our safety. They will simply reduce our ability to defend ourselves from those who have no respect for a single word of our founding documents. They will kill the very opposition that FR used to represent.

Being an American military person is a great Honor. Not only do they defend their country, but they defend the greatest and best country to ever exist. They defend our Bill of Rights and our Constitution. With out those documents we never would have been anything special in the world. And without those who fought and gave their life for those documents then we would not even exist. The documents and the defenders go hand in hand. One without the other has little meaning. Surely both can exist together. Surely we should defend not only from invasion of foreign army's, but also from those that would invade the documents that make us great. I do not believe that the fight against socialism detracts from the activity's of our troops. I do not believe that anyone who is fighting socialism for the good of their country would not support our troops with even more of their hearts. I do not think that we have in our hearts what those in the 60's had in their hearts. They were the socialists that we now fight. May God not only protect our borders, but also the documents that made us great.

445 posted on 09/24/2001 9:58:29 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Lysander Spooner decried the Arlington National Cemetary as 'socialistic' and thought individual soldiers should be required to pay for their own plots and upkeep costs if they wanted to be buried there, rather than burdening everyone else.

I ask once again for your documentation, please? This is quite the allegation and I'm sure you wouldn't mind sharing your source.

446 posted on 09/24/2001 10:17:50 PM PDT by Jolly Rodgers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: Revel
There are close to 7,000 of your former freedom loving American brethern lying burned and crushed under tons of rubble as a result of this dispicable act of terror. Their bodies will never be recovered. Many more of your countrymen are subject to similar sudden and brutal death at the hands of the ruthless cutthroats who now move freely about us and are being trained, financed and supported by bin Laden's terrorist networks in Afghanistan and elsewhere. How many more of your brothers and sisters have to suffer the same fate before all out war is justified?
447 posted on 09/24/2001 10:20:00 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
All out war is indeed justified Jim.

What isn't justified is trashing the Constitution.

L

448 posted on 09/24/2001 10:24:41 PM PDT by Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
What a great post! I bet when I read down further I find that you have been attacked viciously. You gave them many great quotes. There only defense will be attack you like a liberal. I am beginning to believe that the "Sleepers" came to FR along time ago. And they have been waiting for a time like this where they could take over and suppress their enemy. They even deceived the elite. Could it be the CIA at work ?
449 posted on 09/24/2001 10:44:56 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Please point to the thread where I suggested trashing the Constitution.
450 posted on 09/24/2001 10:45:45 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
"What a hardship not to be able to post troop information. "

You people never cease to amaze me. Twist the subject to what ever you can get away from the point. I have not read one person here post that they support the posting of troop movements that have not been made totally public. Not even the author of the article at the top is saying that. I know what he means. He means that the power to "Perceive" a post is the posting of troop information does not even belong any longer to JR. And I have a seen a good many posts here pulled that many people would not "Perceive" to be the posting of troop information. So please get over this Idea that freepers who have been posting here for far longer than you are traitors who pointing laser lights on our troops and shouting to the enemy-"Over Here". The very thought that you could even suggest it just makes me sick!!!!!!!!!

451 posted on 09/24/2001 10:55:10 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Revel
And I have a seen a good many posts here pulled that many people would not "Perceive" to be the posting of troop information.

It doesn't matter what people perceive right now, it's just possible others actually know what needs to be pulled to protect the lives of those brave Americans and British who aren't just talking about freedoms but really fighting for them.

452 posted on 09/24/2001 11:03:24 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: Ada Coddington
I have decided that all this trash is meant to destabalize our country. The russians and chinese do it all the time. Some of our people believe these statements because there is always just enough truth to make them nod and agree to the authors conclusions. This is the same way that conspiracy theorists get there message across...Damned if I'll give it the time of day...Bite me....
453 posted on 09/24/2001 11:07:10 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ada Coddington
the keyboard warriors

Is Elkins referring to himself here? Unless he's one of the ones going to put their life on the line, to risk extreme danger and possibly to die for our freedoms and for this country, he has no room at all to call anyone else a "keyboard warrior". It's all he himself is. Some people type all day about freedom but some people die for them.

454 posted on 09/24/2001 11:19:36 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
" How many more of your brothers and sisters have to suffer the same fate before all out war is justified? "

I keep going back and reading what I wrote. And then what you wrote. I just can't figure out where I said that war was not justified ? I surely don't feel that way. Of course I think we have to stop them. So why are you suggesting that I don't care about those who died or those that may die. I just don't get it...I really don't.

455 posted on 09/24/2001 11:54:55 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
In that regard I am only stating what I believe the point is that the author was tring to make. Personaly it is not the pulling of those particular threads that is of a grave concern to me...no matter if I agree or not.
456 posted on 09/25/2001 12:06:00 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Why did you choose to reply to #445 (though your reply was unfortunately not well-reasoned but rather a pump for the bomb squad) rather than my #444? I don't have a problem with the oft-stated fact that this is a private site that belongs to you, so it's a prerogative as to what info is going to be promoted.

Yet I am confounded by the infernal works going on for so long, not only unnoticed but sometimes even applauded by some of the most honest folks around. How does this square with the real work being done in your name, here and abroad?

Speak for yourself, Jim. But I have become ashamed by what is done. Not only in government but also the "private sector" -- that which is usually a siamese twin to government and banking interests. It is a miracle that FR even exists. Frankly, I don't expect such miracles in the future.

Have you really thought about and weighed the costs in relation to where US is today? Does God approve of what has been done in your name and mine?

I empahsize again: this is a GAME and the world is at stake, IMO. When once we had favor, there is no guarantee anymore. Things change. And even if we (US) gain another temprary advantage through the arm of flesh, that is just another weight against US in the long run. I wish it were not so.

457 posted on 09/25/2001 1:18:35 AM PDT by SelfGov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: knarf
blah blah blah freedom blah blah blah tyranny.

I am getting sick of hearing this broken record.What you people do not seem to understand, is that in war time you have to have a different mindset if you want to be victorious.

458 posted on 09/25/2001 1:40:30 AM PDT by WolfsView
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SelfGov
Why didn't I respond to you? Well, I guess it's because we are a world apart in our thinking and I see no reason to battle with you.
459 posted on 09/25/2001 1:58:21 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: Ada Coddington
Move to Afganistan, or else shut up and sit down.
460 posted on 09/25/2001 2:01:58 AM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 501-503 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson