Posted on 09/21/2001 9:09:50 PM PDT by quimby
Yes but as you can get the "feel" from this thread, it is anything but.
Most call it for what it is, politically correct.</font face="comic sans ms"></font size=2>
But if Bush had been running that war, Serbia would have been a smoking ruin with A-10's and Apaches flying at street level.
Now there's something to cheer for, even more innocent civilian casualties. And that differentiates us from the scumbags who bombed us how exactly?
Why don't you go back to your Taliban buddies. Psychotic mass murderers are not usually welcome in conservative company.
I'd like to exchange passengers Hitlary for Barbara. Yes, too ironic and sad for us.
He didn't mention Clinton by name because *he* was being cowardly. He's been a Clinton apologist, and lately a Condit apologist.
Maher harped over and over that the Clinton thing was "all about sex." He hasn't had the guts to come back and admit the obvious now: Clinton missed what was going on with terrorism because he was 1) too busy doing Monica and, later 2) too busy trying to cover up what he did with Monica.
Clinton had crucial conversations about world situations *while* in the midst of a sex act. Maher has continuously refused to admit that and also failed to recognize the vulnerability of Condit's committee assignments. Maher's defense of these men is destructive. He should be canceled.
We have the advantage of Right on our side. We don't have to lie to get rid of this worm; just repeat the truth of his sorry record. We don't have to ACT mad for dramatic effect; we ARE mad.
Count Maher as the first Freep "casualty" in this war against terrorism. We have telephones to dial sponsors, wallets to snap shut, and are obviously not afraid to take action.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.