Skip to comments.
FFRF Opposes National Day Of Prayer [Have Barf Bags Wide Open and Handy]
Freedom From Religion Foundation ^
| 9/13/01
| Jerkweed
Posted on 09/14/2001 8:31:13 AM PDT by careyb
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 next last
To: DallasDeb
Hmm... non sequitur
81
posted on
09/14/2001 3:03:17 PM PDT
by
BMCDA
To: DallasDeb
YOU GO GIRL!
I am trying to fix this font but no luck. Drives me nutz</font face=times new roman> people think their comment is so damned important they won't take time to preview their message.
82
posted on
09/14/2001 3:04:51 PM PDT
by
fone
To: Sally'sConcerns
For me, today, it all became personal and 'real' to me. I suppose one could say today is MY day of true grief. I got down on my knees and prayed. I sobbed. I lost it today. Me, too, Sally. I've been watching and listening every minute of my waking hours to broadcasts ever since the attack. I've gotten a little teary eyed now and then, but began crying hard while listening to hymns being sung at the service and looking at photo stills on this website.
<http://www.dfuse.net/wtc/> I understand, fully, how you feel today.
To: fone
That only says when it was written, not when it was in effect. Laws like the persisted until the early 1800s (although it is difficult to tell how often the were inforced.)
84
posted on
09/14/2001 3:12:11 PM PDT
by
dely2
To: BMCDA
#81, what is?
To: DallasDeb
How is it your mind is so warped that you could compare our President encouraging prayer, to masturbation or watching gay porn? If you can't get a proper perspective in your life, I would recommend self-commitment to your local insane asylum. They are both private activities that are Constitutionally protected that I do not engage in or feel it is appropriate for the government or representatives of the government to endorse or promote. Not so different after all.
86
posted on
09/14/2001 3:15:48 PM PDT
by
dely2
To: DallasDeb
So nice to see tolerance alive and well in corporate America. Gives me the warm fuzzies. /sarcasm
To: fone
I'm sorry if I messed up the fonts. I did a preview as I always do but in my browser (Opera) it looked all normal otherwise I'd corrected that because I don't like that either. So once again I apologize for this.
88
posted on
09/14/2001 3:18:21 PM PDT
by
BMCDA
To: DallasDeb
I understand, fully, how you feel today. at 5:40 est, foxnews showed the changing of the guard in england.
their band played the star spangled banner. i rose and removed
my hat, placed my hand over my heart. my 8 year old daughter
came down the stairs, looked at me, and quietly took my left hand
and stood beside me. um, daddies arent supposed to cry, huh?
89
posted on
09/14/2001 3:21:27 PM PDT
by
glock rocks
(7:40 in utah time... school bus at 8:00...)
To: DallasDeb
A logical fallacy that means 'it doesn't follow'. Hope this helps.
90
posted on
09/14/2001 3:22:51 PM PDT
by
BMCDA
To: ...
Perhaps what we need to do with people like this is simply tell them that if they cannot be part of the solution, then they will be considered part of the problem...and the problem that we have right now, on this day, and from this day forward, is terrorism. If this person cannot stand a leader leading people to join under one banner, then he/she needs to join another country...and stay there. IF religion is not what he thinks is the answer, then he needs to found a country that has no religion at all. He would probably be very happy in some place like, oh say, CHINA.
anyway, The rest of us need to shun him/her. Turn our backs to him/her and keep praying. They cannot be a part of society now if they refuse to let humans be what they are: Spirit filled.
91
posted on
09/14/2001 3:32:12 PM PDT
by
Alkhin
To: Alkhin
Now you've done it. You've turned a meaningless distinction "those who pray" vs. "those who do not pray" into something much worse: "part of the problem" vs. "part of the solution." It is the creation of this false dichotomy that concerns atheists. Every time there is a national tragedy, the religious elements try to turn it to their advantage and use it to drive a wedge between citizens. I am not responsible for this bombing, and now you've told me that I'm part of the problem. You did not protect us from this tragedy, and you tell us that you are "part of the solution." I'm not sure where you're getting these ideas from, but they're wrong. Religous fervor is what created this problem. Maybe we could set that aside for a little while?
92
posted on
09/14/2001 3:45:28 PM PDT
by
dely2
To: Alkhin
What do you mean by having our leader unite us "under one banner." Do you mean that we should have some form of imposed religion? Shall we expel all who are not of that religion? Are you trying to be the next Hitler? Why is it that this national tragedy brings about your hatred and bigotry? Why do you turn against your fellow countrymen?
93
posted on
09/14/2001 3:48:37 PM PDT
by
dely2
To: careyb
They can take their statement and shove it where the sun don't shine. God bless America! For victory & freedom!!!
To: mbynack
I fact, these FFRF folks seem to want to violate it by attempting to prohibit the President and the people of the US from exercising our right to practice our religion.I think you are absolutely correct. Because they are doing exactly what you that.
I would suggest that these people symbolize what is wrong in America today.
To: He Rides A White Horse
err......exactly what you that.
To: BMCDA
That may be right but those who originally had the intention to pray are doing so nonetheless and those who don't believe in prayer (or don't pray for other reasons) are not going to pray just because the president (or some other autority) says so. Nothing says those who do not want pray have to pray. By the same token, nothing says President Bush can't ask people to pray. Mr. Bush didn't give up his right to free speech when he got elected.
You can ask me to give you a million dollars and I can say no. President Bush can ask people to stand on their heads. People are free to do it or not.
The constitution bars the president from ordering anyone to pray. It does not bar him from asking, any more than it bars me or you from asking.
97
posted on
09/14/2001 4:47:07 PM PDT
by
SUSSA
To: SUSSA
I only wanted to remark that such a prayer request is superfluous.
98
posted on
09/14/2001 4:57:42 PM PDT
by
BMCDA
To: dely2
Are you trying to prove my ignorance or yours?
I wonder if Sir Thomas Gates (the author of that obscure writing) realized that 390 years after his failure, that his law (not Biblically based BTW) would become a rallying point for atheists/agnostics. Well, he's answered for that.
Nonetheless, review The Virginia Records Timeline and give me a break. The Salem Witch hunts (also wrong) resulted in the deaths of 13 people before it was stopped (as it should have been). The pagans today would make you think it was the first holocaust.
These things happened long before the Revolution, I imagine there were many people trying to do the right things the wrong way. The mindset had changed much in the 165 years between 1611 to 1776; not unlike what has transpired since 1836 to present.
I must say society in the last 165 years is a curious paradox of progress and philistinism; thank you for expanding my knowledge of the minutia of historical facts. The next 165 years will be interesting.
99
posted on
09/14/2001 7:02:56 PM PDT
by
fone
To: BMCDA SUSSA
BMCDA: You live on Moltkestrasse street, near the railroad tracks, somewhere in Germany.
Why do you care what our President says?
100
posted on
09/14/2001 7:29:51 PM PDT
by
fone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson