Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lessons of Might and Right (Condi Rice)
The Washington Post ^ | 9/9/2001 | Dale Russakoff

Posted on 09/08/2001 7:18:43 PM PDT by Utah Girl

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:18 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: StopGlobalWhining
Like the Southern Democrat Senators in 1964 who voted against the Civil Rights bill?

I was reading a musty old transcript of some attorney's interview of one of Judge Minor Wisdom (I think) some months ago. If the Democrat senators voted against the Civil Rights bill, I think that had more to do with their cranking the unrest as part of the 60's gramscian Revolution (of which the Civil Rights struggle was only a part) than it did actual sentiment and smarts of Southerners.

It's as if GOP votes in favor of abort legislation actually reflected the views of the constituents who voted them in based on their "personal" pro-life convictions, in other words.

In any case, I'm of the opinion that the North (as always) talks and votes a good game but likes to keep the black folks at a distance while southerners are more apt to treat them like real people and take them into their homes. The worst examples of racism I've seen since living in the South have been courtesy of transplant Yanks and blacks themselves who've been brainwashed by the hateful faction that usurped King and killed Malcolm.

41 posted on 09/08/2001 9:27:21 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: StopGlobalWhining
Because they are hypocritical racists.The only Blacks and Latinos that are welcome in the homes of these limousine liberals are the cleaners and cooks.Condoleeza Rice is an intelligent,no-nonsense person who got where she is by becoming among the best in her field.I would hope that she runs for elective office in the near future.
42 posted on 09/08/2001 9:36:28 PM PDT by steamroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
This is a very inspiring biography. How excellent to have this accomplished person in a top advisory role. It's wonderful to hear her speak and/or do interviews. Her comments are always brilliant with never a 'you know' or 'uhhhh' or 'mmmmmmm'.
43 posted on 09/08/2001 11:14:24 PM PDT by Brasil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
So why is she sounding the note of overcoming segregation and oppression when -- for whatever reason -- it affected not one bit her ability to be educated and achieve to the nth degree?

She knows that and we know that, but the reporter, who grew up in the same town as Dr. Rice, doesn't know that. She tries to get that point across to him in several instances throughout the article. Here are a couple of gems from the article. They point out all that is wrong with liberals and the Democrat party:

Rice herself voted for a Democrat in the first presidential election in which she was eligible, casting her ballot for Jimmy Carter in 1976. She voted for Republican Ronald Reagan in 1980, largely out of distress with what she considered naive statements by Carter about the Soviet Union. In 1984 Hart's farsighted military reform agenda attracted her, although by then, Blacker says, it was clear to him, from joint appearances on arms control panels, that she was "more comfortable" in the Republican Party.

It was also clear to another Stanford colleague, Russia expert Michael McFaul, who remembers Rice telling him she opposed gun control and even gun registration because Bull Connor could have used it to disarm her father and others who patrolled Titusville in 1963. "For me as a liberal, pro-gun control person, it really hit me over the head," McFaul says. "I remember thinking, 'Who are we as white liberals to respond?' "

Rice says it was the issue of race that repelled her from the Democratic Party for good – for reasons that echo the lessons she draws from her family narrative. She remembers watching the 1984 Democratic National Convention that nominated Walter Mondale for president, and recoiling at what seemed to her an endless refrain of appeals to "women, minorities and the poor, which basically means helpless people and the poor."

"If I heard it one more time!" she says, still fuming. "I decided I'd rather be ignored than patronized."

44 posted on 09/09/2001 5:48:16 AM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Nice story. Now, shouldn't Condi advise George to get the US out of Kosovo?
45 posted on 09/09/2001 6:08:06 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Great post. Thank you Ma'am. Sent to my 'School Ma'rm' gals.
46 posted on 09/09/2001 9:42:06 AM PDT by hoot33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
Fall of '97?

Well, I guess I was here first. Still, you got me pulled for spurious reasons about three years ago ... with yawps over perceived (but quite wrong) anti-semitic references to Hillary's thick thighs and her pseudo-Jewishness.

If you don't recall your bleatings to JR as to your grand sniffing out of 'anti-zoggery', ah well ... so it goes.

47 posted on 09/11/2001 9:43:37 PM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson