Skip to comments.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson blasts 'narrow-minded' judging on SCOTUS: ANALYSIS
yahoo.com ^
Posted on 06/21/2025 8:20:12 AM PDT by TigerClaws
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: TigerClaws
She’s as vile as most leftists.
2
posted on
06/21/2025 8:22:15 AM PDT
by
brownsfan
(It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
To: TigerClaws
castigating what she called a "pure textualism" approach to interpreting laws, which she said had become a pretext for securing their desired outcomes
I suppose she thinks it is much better to start with the desired outcome and pay little heed to the text.
3
posted on
06/21/2025 8:22:33 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
To: TigerClaws
To: TigerClaws
Ketanji Brown Jackson is more clueless than originally thought, particularly on the Constitution.
To: TigerClaws
Lefties kill civility. Scalia went out of his way to be kind to liberal Justices. Now we need Justices that hate the left as much as she hates the right.
6
posted on
06/21/2025 8:23:56 AM PDT
by
aynrandfreak
(Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
To: TigerClaws
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson unloaded on her Supreme Court colleagues Friday in a series of sharp dissents, castigating what she called a "pure textualism" That is what judges are supposed to do. Juries have other options. Did this woman go to law school?
7
posted on
06/21/2025 8:24:11 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
To: brownsfan
She should be working as a Walmart greeter. No qualifications at all to be any kind of judge
8
posted on
06/21/2025 8:24:31 AM PDT
by
albie
To: Dr. Sivana
“Pure Textualism” is exactly what the Constitution is, a term of art. There is no other form. There’s no other interpretation.
9
posted on
06/21/2025 8:25:42 AM PDT
by
Macho MAGA Man
(The last two weren't balloons. Onw!as a cylindrical object)
To: TigerClaws
The ‘Remedial Class’ judge.
To: TigerClaws
What she is saying is nonsensical.
Isn’t she the one who doesn’t know whether or not she is a woman?
11
posted on
06/21/2025 8:31:01 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: TigerClaws
Just what the supreme court needs, an angry black woman.
This is becoming a stereotype.
12
posted on
06/21/2025 8:31:28 AM PDT
by
JeanLM
(s )
To: TigerClaws
She is dangerous. Stupid, thinks she is smart, spiteful, and obedient.
13
posted on
06/21/2025 8:32:40 AM PDT
by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
To: BenLurkin
**Isn’t she the one who doesn’t know whether or not she is a woman?**
I don’t know about that, but she refused to define a what a woman is in her confirmation hearings.
Commie to the core. No absolutes. No fear of the Almighty.
And stupid.
14
posted on
06/21/2025 8:36:42 AM PDT
by
Zuriel
(Acts 2:38,39....Do you believe it?)
To: brownsfan
15
posted on
06/21/2025 8:40:10 AM PDT
by
iamgalt
( )
To: TigerClaws
I mean, how dare judges abide by the written laws? Don’t they know judges are supposed to make judgments with their feeeeeeeeeeelings?
16
posted on
06/21/2025 8:40:32 AM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Screw the ChiComms! America first!)
To: aynrandfreak
Leftists have no need for civility when they have POWER.
17
posted on
06/21/2025 8:41:46 AM PDT
by
tet68
("We would not die in that man's company that fears his fellowship to die with us." Henry V.)
To: TigerClaws
Just the gift Roberts needs..his own personal scold.
18
posted on
06/21/2025 8:44:07 AM PDT
by
rottweiller_inc
(Lupus urbem intravit. Fulminis ictu vultures super turrem exanimat.)
To: TigerClaws
We have become a below average nation in just about every facet. It is what happens when leaders are selected based on merit, sex, or race instead of on those qualities that make one the best leader available.
To: TigerClaws
She is dumb as a box of rocks and hates the constitution. She should be ignored.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson