War-Pig Lindsey Graham Itching for Another Endless War with Iran — Tells Trump to Go “All‑In” and Join with Israel

Gateway Pundit ^ | Jun. 17, 2025 | by Jim Hoft

[adorno]

Somebody doesn’t like ‘war pig’ Lindsey Graham.

But, war pig or not, he is right.

And we’ve been assisting Israel against the Muslim terrorist states since Israel was born.

We give them foreign aid, and military aid, and we assist them with intelligence and even with the weapons which are what’s making the difference against Iran. And with many Israelis having American and Israeli citizenship, it’s very likly that there are “Americans” involved in the direct war against Iran and its proxies.

And we’ve been involved in the war against Iran and others in the middle-east, when those countries directly and openly declare the U.S. as their biggest enemy.

So, the war pig is only asking tor the obvious truth to be told, and that is that, we have been and should continue to be involved in the war against Iran and making sure that they can’t get their hands on nuclear weapons.

No need to remain in denial about the clear truth about Iran and how their radical military policies need to be ended, violently if necessary. Fight fire with fire. Stop being stupid, as we have been for over 40 years with Iran.

[Zathras]

Agreed.
Besides, Israel knows that the USA security org is filled with holes.
They do NOT want to share tactical with the USA or the MSM will pick it up in hrs.

[Resolute Conservative]

May not can take them out, but you can bury under millions of tons of rock and they can’t get to them.

[Forward the Light Brigade]

Looks like the War pigs are going to get their war—in Hours Trump will order an attack—He just wrote that Iran should surrender. Maybe nuke one of the underground nuke factories? This could go bad fast. Lets see what happens by tonight.

[JesusIsLord]

The reality is that we will probably see the Iranian people take a lead in liberating their country which will change the entire complexion of the situation.

The Iranian "people" deposed the Shaw on favor of radical Islamic rule/dictators. I question how many Iranians are willing to fight a civil war. Russia will support the current regime with all the hardware and possibly men it needs. Who's supporting those willing to fight the current regime. I think the only way we see a regime change is if the U.S. or other nations puts boots on the ground. Unconditional surrender and subsequent occupation of Japan and Germany was required . I believe the same will be required for contemporary despotic regimes . I hope my assessment is wrong and we see a civil war in Iran with the despots removed.

[ABStrauss]

Is Linda foaming a the mouth yet?

May need a straight-jacket.

[Kazan]

Giving them the bunker busters is pointless because they don't have any planes that can deliver them. It can only be delivered with the Stealth Bomber, which means US involvement.

Give Israel the planes and bunker busters.

It's absolutely worth us not getting directly involved.

[adorno]

If its that important of a national issue then where is the congressional authorization for action? Just seems that the congress should weigh in on commitments like this.

Russia or China send a nuclear missile towards the U.S. Should congress be convened in order to declare war against China or Russia?

Al-Waeda sends a bunch of terrorists to use jet planes as bombs to destroy some very important American assets. Did congress have to be convened for the U.S. to take action against the culprits?

Iran uses proxies to bomb American and other ships with cargo meant for the U.S. and other countries. Should congress have to be convened every time one of those proxies or Iran itself attack American and allies assets?

[woweeitsme]

Totally agree. We can send a delegation to help negotiate or provide Israel with bombs or whatever they may need, but we cannot be flying planes over Iran.

[heartwood]

One Seth Cropsey, former deputy undersecretary of the Navy, writes in the WSJ today that we have the opportunity to shepherd in a new Middle East. So we can choke off China and Russia.

Because we’ve been so good at that these last eighty years, playing global strategy chess in the land of oil and Islam.

[Starboard]

So according to your logic there is never any congressional authorization needed under any circumstances.

[adorno]

Russia will support the current regime with all the hardware and possibly men it needs.

Very unlikely. In fact, can't happen. Russia is in a big bind fighting to take Ukraine, and they need all assets available to stay in the fight. Iran will suffer the same fate as Syria, if they don't surrender soon. Russia is out of the equation as far as Iran is concerned.

[anton]

He’s a homo douchebag. I just as soon hear from Liz Chaney.

[BrexitBen]

Why does Sean Hannity continue to give that little chicken-hawk weasel Linda Graham air time?

Somebody in South Carolina primary this tin soldier. PLEASE!

[Sequoyah101]

Probably the most important thing to deal with is regime change when the power vacuum is created with the departure of the mullahs. Who will fill it? Who will orchestrate or influence the filling? Israel is not positioned for this job and we should only do it if we don’t require troops. It is a nation of 90 million and we sure don’t want it either just like we should not want to take over the likes of Mexico. Russia probably does not want it, they have their own problem and future problem in Ukraine, China may want it but probably only wants the oil. We don’t care if they buy the oil and in fact that would be best for the replacement regime. Nobody wants anything similar to what is there now and nobody should want the risk of a power vacuum and organically grown regime such as is likely taking place in Syria and Lebanon. Maybe the Israelis have a hand on that though.

[adorno]

Give Israel the planes and bunker busters.

It's absolutely worth us not getting directly involved.

Giving Iran the bunker busters, is getting directly involved.

Though not the same... if you give a murderer the weapon with which to kill someone, you are directly involved. You intended for that murderer to commit the murder.

In the case of Israel, giving them the bunker buster is for defense, but it's still getting involved, since Israel did noot have that weapon originally.

[adorno]

So according to your logic there is never any congressional authorization needed under any circumstances.

It's just a formality, for the most part.

For any aggressive military action against us, we would not be able to wait stupidly while the enemy continues its attack until congress gives the go-ahead to retaliate.

If we retaliate as soon as the enemy attacks, the congressional approval would just be a stupid formality.

If the president or a general takes actions which were unnecessary and proved to be unwarranted, those officials can be held accountable after the conflict is over. But acting/reacting too late could be very deadly if we have to wait for congress to act.

[Starboard]

I agree about the time element. Obviously there can be extremely urgent conditions which do not afford the luxury of debate. But when there is time to consider the wisdom and ramifications of sending American troops and assets into harms way there should be some examination of the potential consequences.

We have seen more than enough blood and treasure squandered in endless conflicts. Enough to make us question those kinds of engagements/entanglements when time affords.

[montag813]

So Gayboy Pundit is with Iran now. Got it.

[adorno]

We have seen more than enough blood and treasure squandered in endless conflicts.

Meanwhile, the world has seen how small/insignificant quarrels/conflicts, eventually become larger and more deadly conflicts/wars. Like WW1 and WWII.

Better to quash the smaller conflicts 'now', than to have to spend a not more time and materiel and shed huge amounts of blood, in a much larger conflict which may turn out unmanageable.

Myopia is what causes the bigger wars.