Posted on 05/09/2025 4:33:16 PM PDT by dynachrome
You made the statement: "What you can't seem to get your head around is that everything with hinges inherently has what is known as a pinch point hazard. Go look it up."
Well, I already knew that there are hinges that don't have a pinch point hazard but I looked it up and sent you pictures. Here's another one with the "garden gate" hinges that somehow "I don't approve".
Do you need a fully dimensioned drawing to understand the size of chain link fences? You can fit a wrist between this gate and the post without pinching it, much less a finger. And yes, the gate is CLOSED.
Igloo designed, built, failed to properly test, and sold a cooler that amputates children's fingers while other cooler manufacturers don't. The other manufacturers apparently figured out the correct standards and testing where Igloo failed.
AND THERE IT IS
Thank you for putting your Fallacy of False Equivalence in writing; illogically equating the risk of death from electrocution by an adult negligently sticking a fork into a correctly built toaster, with a child risking amputating a finger due to a faulty drink cooler.
Adult <-> Child
Appliance with known electrical hazards <-> innocuous plastic cooler
Intentional unsafe act <-> harmless normal usage
Correctly designed and tested appliance, the same as other consumer models <-> Flawed design, improper testing, that amputates fingers unlike other coolers
These children took no "Darwin Award" risks by getting a drink from an Igloo cooler yet lost fingers.
So... korporate public affairs release writer?
Nope. Not a false equivalence. Any stupidly mis-used product can injure you. If you’re stupid or careless every single thing in your life is a danger to you. There’s nothing a product designer can do to protect you from yourself.
I’ll repeat...
“Nothing is foolproof because fools are so ingenious”
Still waiting for you to support your claim that the cooler violated some known safety standard. You can’t because a product with something swinging on a hinge has an inherent pinch point hazard.
Slamming a finger in a hinged door is an “intentional unsafe act”. Everyone knows to keep your fingers clear. According to you there is no such thing as an “intentional unsafe act”. It’s ALWAYS the fault of the product and never the fault of someone’s stupidity. And, yeah, unsupervised kids do stupid things. Like slam their fingers in a household door, a car door or a cooler.
You’ve already admitted that this is just bottom feeding lawyers looking for a payday from the high profile company with deep pockets.
Just stop. I've never "admitted" this is just "bottom feeding lawyers looking for a payday from the high profile company with deep pockets."
Children have lost fingers. What is "bottom feeding" about that? I've insisted it's a company that designed a flawed product and failed to test it properly.
But you go with what you want. Igloo may have job openings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.