Kamala Harris on Board with Administration’s Threat to Israel

Harris’ acceptance speech to the 2024 Democratic National Convention drew one of her most thunderous applause lines when she called for an end to the violence and suffering Israel is inflicting in Gaza and for the long-denied fulfillment of Palestinian rights to dignity, security, freedom and self-determination.

This enthusiastic reception by tens of thousands of die-hard Democrats at the convention, was a faithful reflection of where the base of the party stands on Israeli issues.

And now we hear that drjill Biden has been pressuring her husband on Israel’s war on Hamas, saying. “Stop it. Stop it now, Joe.” At a Ramadan event at the White House, Joe Biden reportedly told attendees about “Jill’s sophisticated geopolitical advice.”

Progressive agitator Michael Moore told Democrat Biden to stop “funding Israeli genocide.” Moore lacerated Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “How many times can Netanyahu flaunt your rules, ignore your advice, and spit in your face? He came to Our House, the People’s House, and spewed hate and violence.”

Senator Bernie Sanders criticized Biden’s approval of sending more weapons to Israel. “The US cannot beg Netanyahu to stop bombing civilians one day and the next send him thousands more 2,000 lb. bombs that can level entire city blocks. This is obscene,” Sanders said on X, sharing the report of Washington Post. “We must end our complicity: No more bombs to Israel,” Sanders reiterated.

“CBS Mornings” TV anchor Tony Dokoupil got into trouble for pressing Ta-Nehisi Coates, about his virulent anti-Israel views on the Middle East conflict, and his questioning Israel’s right to defend itself.

CBS’s pending sale to a studio run by movie producer David Ellison of “Top Gun: Maverick” fame was jittery. David’s father is Larry Ellison, one of the world’s richest men, and one of the most pro-Israel executives in corporate America — he’s best buds with Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu.

IneligibleHarris is a terrible choice for a presidential candidate, having never accomplished a single significant (positive) thing in her entire public life. Plus, of course, her ineligibility. And, the fact that she couldn’t win a single electoral vote from any state at all the last time she ran. Not one.
Plus her rich extra-curricular social life (Willie Brown and forward?) is anathema to millions of voters.
And her inability to speak three coherent sentences.
And her “wonderful” service as USA’s “Border Czar”...(SATIRE ALERT!)
and we could go on

you’d think that the Puppetmeisters controlling the D party machine would have selected somebody sale-able and even nominally competent and fit for the job?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.