Posted on 09/01/2024 4:59:39 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
Disgusting pander to more than likely one of the team to pull him over the finish line.
Hey Joey those should be given to veterans not political hacks
When you reward unlawful behavior, you get more of it. How far will Fulton County go to elect Kamala Harris?
Don't let them gloss this over!
What REALLY occurred:
Texas v. Pennsylvania, 592 U.S. ___ (2020)
President Trump and the Republican National Committee (RNC) launched many lawsuits against swing states challenging their vote tallies, particularly in states that had voted for Trump in the 2016 United States presidential election but had turned to Biden in 2020, such as Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia. Most of the previous cases raised by Trump and the RNC were dismissed on procedural grounds or rejected on substantive grounds in the courts and did not affect the projected Electoral College result. (in other words, they never heard evidence)
The Texas v. Pennsylvania case was filed on December 8, 2020, directly with the Supreme Court as it holds original jurisdiction over disputes between states. Such cases are infrequent: there were 123 "original jurisdiction" cases from 1789 to 1959. Original jurisdiction cases are immediately docketed pursuant to Rule 17 once the plaintiff submits its motion for leave to file and pays its docket fees. Because the suit requested expedited consideration, the Court set a deadline at 3:00 p.m. on December 10 for the four defendant states to respond.
Within one day of Texas's filing, Trump, over 100 Republican Representatives, and 18 Republican state attorneys general filed motions to support the case. Trump referred to this case as "the big one" of the election-challenging lawsuits.
The Supreme Court issued orders on December 11, declining to hear the case on the basis that Texas lacked standing under Article III of the Constitution to challenge the results of the election held by another state.
The USSCOTUS NEVER heard evidence beyond the initial briefs.
Rudy needs a benefactor who can pick up the slack on millions in lawfare for him.
Walz’s brother seems like a Great story! He does not want the country suject to his brothers ideology nor the future of the country subject to it. Apparently, his brother already knows what we suspect about Walz.
There were several spread out among the various networks which we covered like no one else almost as soon as they happened.
Most were aimed at Trump. They had to lie to make any of them sound convincing but they aimed to make him out demonic especially about abortion which he has already stated will be up to each individual state.
It was almost comical that they tried to blame border fiasco on congress or Trump never on themselves. That’s hard to do especially since all the problems have come because of and under their watch.
They even went after him on the economy which is about as bizarre as you can get since they are the ones woho hav savaged the country with endless spending,no drilling,no nukes, no this and that and inflation that also destroyed the economy.
So nothing was heard. How can anyone claim there is no fraud when the judges or others refused to hear the cases. The left beat us bad on lawfare. It was our fault we let them compromise everyone. Let’s hope it does not happen again.
Yeah! Their border bill was a joke!
dems/Biden: let in several thousands a day...
Republicans: Close the border! Reinstate Trump EO’s, this is horrible!
Americans: Yeah, this is awful! Close the border!
Black guys: They’s taking our benefits! Close the border!
dems/Biden: Okay ,we made a new law. We’ll cap incoming to 4,000 a day.
Republicans: NO! We’re not going to vote for that. It’s even worse than doing nothing. It codifies the open border!
Trump: What a piece of garbage!
Republicans vote against it. Bill dies with no further action, like taking the worse parts out, like happens all the time in legislation.
DNCMedia: Trump kills democrat’s solid border bill. It’s all about politics with him! (actually, us jo-urinal-ists, but you’re not supposed to notice THAT!).
Yup! NEVER let them get away with saying Trump lost the case on merit.
Many people actually do, because that is the LIE the media told them.
no standing /= no evidence.
Sorry, it cut off the key line:
DNCMedia says there is no evidence of election cheating. Cites these cases. Nobody legally heard the cheat evidence.
You left out J Cornyn
They can get away with this case for a while but not forever. Is this the case where the Supreme court claimed they did not want to be the ones to elect a president?
I heard there was some of that bS.
Lowering the rate won’t help inflation will it? But that will probably show up in trumps reign. Also,I would bet the strategic oil supply is at a low level.
Exactly dems always seem to forget the key issue on anything they claim.
Eye opening watching this is good use of your time.
BFL
Once trump is potus there will be courts that will hear the election cheat for sure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.