Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A ‘Warren Report’ isn’t going to fly in 2024: It’s 2024, not 1963, and this time around, America has a mountain of evidence and an army of investigators
American Thinker ^ | 07/24/2024 | Cliff Nichols

Posted on 07/24/2024 6:32:07 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: central_va

Every site is different and has its own security challenges—so an apples to apples comparison is difficult.

What we can focus on is what was different between Butler and previous sites—and the video identifies some of those.

—No written operations plan
—No sniper or even observer on the high ground (water tower)
—Replacement of experienced SS Agent in Charge with idiot from Pittsburgh


61 posted on 07/24/2024 8:43:24 AM PDT by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

No air surveillence


62 posted on 07/24/2024 8:46:11 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

I think it would wise to review the QUALITY of protection at all previous Trump rallys.


63 posted on 07/24/2024 8:47:07 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: central_va

True for Butler—but I did not comment on that because I do not know whether it was true for previous sites as well.


64 posted on 07/24/2024 8:49:08 AM PDT by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
I do not know whether it was true for previous sites as well.

I am not just questioning Butler, I am questioning everything. Even previous rally site security.

65 posted on 07/24/2024 8:50:39 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I get that—but whatever the baseline was—Butler was clearly significantly worse.

Replacing a competent Special Agent in Charge with an idiot is such a critical move.

A competent SAIC can overcome a lot of other deficiencies with quick thinking and improvising if anything goes wrong.


66 posted on 07/24/2024 8:58:23 AM PDT by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Bongino is being brutally honest and he’s worried about Trump with the guy moved up to be acting director of SS.


67 posted on 07/24/2024 9:00:33 AM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (They don't care. We don't scare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There’s so much.

Last night, the local chief stated that one of his officers fired at the suspect, IIRC. So there are now two sources of gunfire.

The biggest gaslighting so far has been the story of the cop on the roof. I’m convinced it never happened, and so far even though we have the suspect on video and in view for approx two minutes, there is no video proof or collaborating witnesses.

So, who were these brave officers? Why isn’t the media hounding them for their names?


68 posted on 07/24/2024 9:19:24 AM PDT by Not_Who_U_Think (`-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

One more thing -

The last shot comes 12(?) seconds after the burst of fire. Assuming that’s from the counter sniper.

The sequence of events seems odd. Crooks aims and fires three shots. After that period of time, Trump is crouched down and protected.

Who is he aiming for? and who did he hit? You mean he fired off that long string into nothing?

And then the two final shots. The last one is clearly from a different gun and location, a pretty safe bet it’s counter sniper fire. Did Crooks stick his head up over the roof again? I can’t think of any assassin in history who stuck around after action. Or for that matter who decided to fire at innocents after failure.


69 posted on 07/24/2024 9:48:27 AM PDT by Not_Who_U_Think (`-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer
Bongino has reported Martenson’s second shooter existed, but was actually a non—SS sniper shooting at the perp and missing.

That’s been my first hypothesis versus all the unverified “There was a second shooter!!!” hype. However, that means to get the shots off so quickly after Crooks, the non—SS sniper may have had to have Crooks in sight as Crooks fired. If so, why didn’t the sniper take out Crooks BEFORE Crooks fired?

70 posted on 07/24/2024 9:58:18 AM PDT by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: central_va

It’s too hard to put any faith in this government. They got caught up in so many lies over the years. Every time a head of an agency is called to testify in front of congress they lie and refuse to answer questions. It’s so aggravating that I can’t even watch them anymore. These people are supposed to work for us and answer to congress but they do neither. They work for and answer to the small group of dictators running our country.


71 posted on 07/24/2024 10:36:46 AM PDT by Rdct29 (The Democrats Are The New Nazi Party )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Hanlon's razor states: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

My inclination in this situation is to attribute this to a high level of incompetence brought on by this administration's DEI practice of selecting candidates for positions based solely on the person's race, gender or sexual preference and not on actual qualifications. However, we have not had a Biden administration step down as a result of Democrat pressure. They usually deny culpability, accuse Republicans of politicizing the situation, circle the wagons, and avoid any accountability. The fact that Democrats demanded accountability is what has sown some doubt in my mind and makes me wonder if the blaming for negligence is to provide the needed scalp and avoid too deep of a dig for the truth. If Republicans pursue too much, they will then accuse them of pushing conspiracy and point to her resigning for her negligence. All the while, they consider her negligence to be in failing at her real mission.

72 posted on 07/24/2024 11:18:40 AM PDT by Armando Guerra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Truth Will Make You Free

“If so, why didn’t the sniper take out Crooks BEFORE Crooks fired?”

Perhaps his assignment wasn’t to take out Crooks BEFORE Crooks fired, but rather AFTER.


73 posted on 07/24/2024 12:54:39 PM PDT by Ignatz (The bees don't bother to tell the flies that honey tastes better than dung.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson