Posted on 06/20/2024 10:42:22 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Their eternal destinations won’t be so enjoyable unless they turn to Jesus Christ before it’s too late.
They don’t deserve to be parents then.
Indeed.
They can always turn to Jesus before it’s too late, but if they refuse, then it’s a sad choice they’ve made for their souls.
“Why is this behavior tolerated? “
I worked for General Dynamics. In every contract I read there was a clause about maintaining a gay and lesbian outreach or some other gay related cause. There was always something about DEI, although it wasn’t called that yet. ESG hadn’t come along yet, but I suspect it’s there now. If you wanted all of your award fee, the extra money companies get for meeting all the contractual causes, you’d better be able to demonstrate you’d met everything. At some point I noticed there were bumper stickers in the lot reading things like, “I’m a lesbian. Deal with it.”
This is not just tolerated; it’s demanded by governments at all levels. Not just military contracts. The problem is a “movement” can’t ever be “satisfied.” We went from gays, “just wanting to be treated like everyone else” to “you must bake the cake, or we’ll sue you” in about thirty minutes after marriage became legal. The problem is the people running the movement are employed. If the movement obtains its objectives, then they are no longer employed. Therefore, each time they achieve and objective they dig up the goal posts and move them further towards crazy. And yes, a part of “the movement” has always been about normalizing pedophilia. It has also always been connected with the Left’s desire to break apart the family and the West’s cultural and military power. Those things are sometimes separate, sometimes intertwined and they often support each other politically and monetarily.
This is “tolerated” because it is massively well funded and organized.
The 2nd shortest verse in the Bible:
Remember Lot’s wife. Luke 17:32
“If they had a parade like this around these parts or I suspect in most of America, there would be bloodshed.”
I think you a wrong.
The decent folk would let them go about their wicked ways and not raise a hand for its suppurt or for violence against it.
Why braid a whip to fight against them .
Ceasar will just make you a laughing stock or an inmate.
Interesting post.
The headline is that military industrial state corporations will do anything for government contracts.
Anything.
That—my FRiend is called evil.
They are evil.
“That—my FRiend is called evil.
They are evil.”
Enjoy ...
The payoffs they expect will not be the payoffs they receive.
Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
“The headline is that military industrial state corporations will do anything for government contracts.”
My take is slightly different. The guys at the top of the pyramid take home six and seven figure “bonuses.” The amount of those bonuses is determined by the corporate objectives. If the objective is to get all of the available award fee, then those guys will do whatever is required to make that goal. Also, the expense of all that stuff, the outreach program, the cost of compliance with the global warming initiates, the ISO 9000 program, is all folded into the cost of the project. The company profit is a percentage of the cost of the project. What company or CEO isn’t trying to optimize the company profit? If they don’t do that, they get replaced. They aren’t maximizing shareholder value. Everyone along the line, the individual congressmen who withhold their vote until they get their set-aside, the people in the military who want THEIR project to be more expensive because it increases their rank and value to the service, and all those people in the company who make percentages all know what they’re doing, and everyone is doing it for their personal (and corporate) advantage.
This is how the system is set up to operate. No individual is particularly at fault. The system has, with some modifications for whatever the personal goals were at the time, worked like this since the Revolutionary War. Go back and look as some of the incredibly stupid contracts made during the Civil War for examples.
Yes, it’s evil. But I don’t see any way to reform it given how the system is set up to work. The reform would have to start in Congress. And how likely is that, given how every individual under the present system, gets his reward?
There is something called integrity and honor.
Those corporate executives have done.
They should be ashamed of themselves.
Their souls were bought far too cheaply.
Pride parades generally consist of one homosexual fetish following another.
This is a two-sided coin. The corporate officers are doing what Congress has asked them to do. Failure do that fails to optimize shareholder value, which they are REQUIRED to do. Which would more Vilate honor and integrity? In your analysis you solely blame the corporation when they are working with the rules set up by Congress. It’s not the other way around.
I think we all understand that politicians are largely self-interested scumbags. But they too are operating for their own, and secondarily, the best interest of their constituents. Some of those loud, nasty constituents are evil bastards who want to destroy the culture as it once existed. (I put it that way because the culture I grew up under is well and truly dead. Note that men are allowed to beat up women in formerly women’s sports. Criminals are let go while innocent protestors against cultural corruption are in prison.)
The point is, turn the coin over and blame both sides. But, how, exactly, could we change it?
It is not about changing it.
It is about each individual being able to look in the mirror and see an honorable person looking back at them.
There are no excuses or legitimate explanations for catering to perverts.
They should—and any moral person must—quit first.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.