Posted on 06/14/2024 6:57:43 AM PDT by Twotone
Fixed it. Abortion is not "treatment" or "reproductive care".
If voters in individual states, decide that women can have their babies killed, under whatever circumstances outlined in the various state's laws- Pro life will have to continue making their case, that women should let their babies live.
The reason "abortion" is controversial is because, in reality, it IS baby killing.
Calling it what it is, defines the issue clearly.
Examples:
Should a woman be able to have her baby killed up to the moment of birth, (or even after), when the baby can feel pain?
(Should "doktors" be able to make profits off of the sales of the babies body parts?)
OTOH:
Shoud a woman be able to have her baby killed if her life is edangered from the pregnancy, or if she was raped, or is the victim of incest?
The abotion pill kills the baby, but in the earliest stages of development. Should women be able to kill their babies this way? The states have to decide.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.