Skip to comments.
A grant program for Black women business owners is discriminatory, appeals court rules
The Associated Press ^
| June 3, 2024
| BY ALEXANDRA OLSON
Posted on 06/04/2024 6:47:48 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Special treatment is NOT equal treatment. Could just be me.....
2
posted on
06/04/2024 6:48:48 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
3
posted on
06/04/2024 6:49:40 AM PDT
by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Discrimination is either illegal or it is not; you cannot pick and choose.
To: rktman
Special treatment based on skin color and sex is actually discriminatory.
5
posted on
06/04/2024 6:52:47 AM PDT
by
No name given
(Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
To: No name given
Or is it the dems message to non whites that without them they are incapable of accomplishing anything.
7
posted on
06/04/2024 6:54:43 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I’m a bit confused, if it’s a private company and it’s their money, why can’t they do what they want with it?
8
posted on
06/04/2024 6:55:53 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“These judges bought what a small group of white men were selling.”
Well, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed by a Congress primarily composed of white men and signed into law by a white man...
9
posted on
06/04/2024 6:56:16 AM PDT
by
hanamizu
( )
To: Oldeconomybuyer
How is this different than senior discounts and ladies night drinks half off?
To: Flaming Conservative; Oldeconomybuyer
>Discrimination is either illegal or it is not; you cannot pick and choose.
Disagree.
Discrimination via GOVT == no no
By the Individual == perfectly acceptable/legal (where {X} wishes to eat/shop+, for reason {Y}).
11
posted on
06/04/2024 6:57:13 AM PDT
by
i_robot73
(One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Capitalizing “black” Is discriminatory so I won’t read the article.
12
posted on
06/04/2024 6:57:41 AM PDT
by
bwest
To: No name given ; rktman
>Special treatment based on skin color and sex is actually discriminatory.
...& sex/rac-ist.
13
posted on
06/04/2024 6:58:34 AM PDT
by
i_robot73
(One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
To: i_robot73
Obviously I was referring to the former.
To: rktman
Good.
Now run the ENTIRE Federal Procurement system through that ruling.
15
posted on
06/04/2024 7:02:05 AM PDT
by
Liberty Ship
("Lord, make me fast and accurate.")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“Diversity” is nothing more than discrimination against whites and men -as this case shows.
Next up - Federal hiring preferences. +5 for minority and +5 for female is effectively -10 for white males.
16
posted on
06/04/2024 7:03:27 AM PDT
by
Justa
(Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people....)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
A venture capital fund dare not discriminate. That’s the realm of government to do that.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
18
posted on
06/04/2024 7:06:25 AM PDT
by
JayGalt
(DEI = Didn’t Earn It)
To: i_robot73
Discrimination via GOVT == no no By the Individual == perfectly acceptable/legal (where {X} wishes to eat/shop+, for reason {Y}). Perhaps at issue is that the Fearless Fund is a tax-deductible 501(c)3 and doing discrimination? I dunno if that's part of the legality on their discrimination being ruled illegal.
19
posted on
06/04/2024 7:06:25 AM PDT
by
Tell It Right
(Galatians 6:14 -- May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ...)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I though der kleine Führer Georgi Soros was the patron Sugar Daddy for overweight “Black” women.
20
posted on
06/04/2024 7:09:09 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(When did WE decide to make America a UN 5-Star Asylum Paradise for Socialist losers?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson