Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A prosecution so crooked it would make Joseph Stalin blush! ALAN DERSHOWITZ reveals the exact courtroom moment he knew Trump was doomed to a guilty verdict
UK Daily Mail ^ | May 31 2024 | ALAN DERSHOWITZ

Posted on 05/31/2024 11:14:37 AM PDT by knighthawk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

“Dersh doesn’t know what this out-of-control ‘judge’ will do.”

Absolutely. Being a Jew, I figure he hears “Nazi” and immediately believes that nothing that bad ever could happen here.

He. Is. Wrong. Biden isn’t above that at ALL.


41 posted on 05/31/2024 4:27:17 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Navarro didn't kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

My brother was here for dinner. He thinks the sentence will be for a week in jail. The week will be July 14-20.


42 posted on 05/31/2024 4:37:03 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Navarro didn't kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

I posted a while back that I was trying to give Merchan the benefit of the doubt. Then I read his jury instructions. That removed those doubts. Merchand is a hateful partisan fanatic.


43 posted on 05/31/2024 6:16:40 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Show me the man, and, Marchan DeBragg will show you the crime.


44 posted on 05/31/2024 6:18:31 PM PDT by Jane Long (The role of the GOP: to write sharply-worded letters as America becomes a communist hell-hole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

I knew it was rigged long before that. The case was about accounting records, i.e., whether they were misleading to conceal the settlement agreement with SD. The existence of the agreement was not disputed. The truth or falsity of SD’s claims made not one difference to the charges. Yet Merchan let her testify as to what underwear he was wearing (and yes, PDJT’s lawyers objected to the testimony, contrary to Merchan’s lies). I can’t think of a more textbook example of irrelevant and highly prejudicial testimony being allowed in in violation of the accused’s rights. So why did Merchan do it? Because if PDJT testified in his own defense, the prosecution would have been allowed to cross-examine him to try to support SD’s testimony. As his lawyer, would you have allowed PDJT to take the stand knowing that was coming?


45 posted on 05/31/2024 6:46:27 PM PDT by Consistent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Consistent
As his lawyer, would you have allowed PDJT to take the stand knowing that was coming?

No. I think Merchan's jury instructions were more outrageous than allowing SD's testimony, because the instructions literally told the jury a lie that was calculated to make the jury believe Trump was guilty. Both actions by the judge were wrong.

46 posted on 05/31/2024 7:04:12 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson