Posted on 05/11/2024 9:05:58 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Wait. What?
And no doubt they will win the suit and the taxpayers will be the ones who get effed. NYC is dead, finito. I don’t think it will ever recover from the DeBlasio/Adams/lefist city council Holocaust.
FDRQ delenda est...
They want the city to fund the IVF procedure and to pay the surrogate mother who can choose to abort that baby 9 months later.
Indeed.
Does the plan cover IVF for surrogates when the “mother” is female?
Well since they aren’t equipped for pregnancy, it’s a reasonable stance to take.
And when they have their designer child they will sodomize him?
Then after birth they will demand the state pay for the child’s day care and psychiatric bills.
First, they would use IVF, where an egg is combined with a sperm in a lab, and second, they would work with an agency to hire a surrogate who would have the fertilized egg implanted and would carry the baby to term.
Is it really best practice, in IUI, to implant only a single fertilized egg?
Aren't, in fact, multiple eggs fertilized, many then discarded (because they are of "inferior" quality), and then several implanted - in the hope that only a single survives?
Isn't that routinely done?
Regards,
EMAW (Every man a ... woman?)
If WWII combat vets had crystal balls in ‘41 and could see what happened to this country 80 years later, I suspect they might have decided to go for the “I have crystal balls” deferments.
Two men pretending to be married. This is is Weimar-tier insanity.
Sounds right.
Can’t really implant anything in either gay guy.
invitro fertilization for male couples, metal illness alert and the stupid pay with out tax dollars because there is no deterrent or punishment and they know it and dont give a sh##. we need a to flush the toilet across America
It seems to me the surrogate is a third party not covered under the insurance policy.
Plus, the fetus is merely a clump of cells. /s
If this is allowed, the next logical step is to demand that any procedure covered by insurance can be transferred to a non-covered individual....because....”I am gay”.
EC
First they have to decide whose ass the fertilized (and doomed) egg will be implanted in - or maybe just give them the egg because their butts are probably already liberally (dual meaning) supplied with sperm.
There’s no place they won’t go to raise their future sex toys...
Cue the Monty Python clip: I want to be called Loretta...I want to have babies” “You don’t have a womb!!!”
NYC won’t recover if it continues to allow its elections to be stolen.
Gotham has RCV for a reason.
...and surrogacy. That is where the problem is. They can’t do IVF on fags because there are no ovaries in which to stick the embryos. Not to mention there are no eggs to fertilize. Add in surrogacy and the dam breaks. Why do some insist on providing children for the pleasure of faggots?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.