Posted on 03/04/2024 3:24:23 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
Yes, the 14th Amendment was passed to stop Confederate officials from serving in the US Congress.
“But enforcement of Reconstruction would be impossible if state and local governments in the South were run by former Confederates, and if Congress, in the words of Pennsylvania Representative Thaddeus Stevens, was “filled with yelling secessionists and hissing copperheads.””
From History.com
The South wasn’t fighting to replace Abraham Lincoln.
It wasn’t a civil war, it was a war between the states.
It wasn’t an insurrection
Taking your post at face value, you use the above condition twice.
Who makes this decision, in your view?
I want DJT back for many reasons....1.5% inflation,$1.99 a gallon milk and a southern border sealed tight being near the top of the list.
And you honestly think he can bring back all that? Well he isn’t The Wizard of Oz and he could not do it either.
they are insurrectionists
I agree with the minority.
SCOTUS should have just ruled narrowly on this. Not a state’s issue and be done.
The use of the 14th for something other than what it was intended, was to keep Pres. Trump from a 2nd term.
Nothing more.
So, now let’s say, the same scenario with Pres. Trump’s 2nd term.
Super rat majority in the house and senate.
(We need to keep our eyes on those balls...almost more important the Pres. Trump getting elected)
Charges a President with insurrection and sends the referral to DOJ.
DOJ decides to indict.
Will there be a trial ?
If so, where will the trial be held ?
D.C.
Guessing there would be no appeal to SCOTUS because SCOTUS already left it up to Congress ?
Makes no sense. The left has completely forgotten that Trump withstood the impeachment vote for his actions. No court in the land has found him guilty of insurrection.
Like the one currently in the White House?
They said that after Tom Brady’s first 6 Super Bowl rings.
Which decision?
Let’s expel them from office and into jail.
It’s harder to boot an oath-breaking incumbent.
I’ll be glad to have this insurrectionist nonsense behind us.
Name these “some” because hiding a hit piece by claiming its journalism reporting on some interview that never took place doesn’t work anymore.
There hasn’t been a need to “boot oath breaking insurrectionist” from the ballot in modern times so why all the sudden concern about how easy or difficult the process is? We’ve never had an oath breaking insurrectionist as our president, and that includes Trump. But we have had oath breaking, ineligible traitors, on the ballot and in the White House (Obama and Biden) and removing THEM from the ballot or from office was difficult enough to have never succeeded.
No kidding I asked one to give me his definition of the word & all I got was the”deer in the headlights “ look Then I gave him Benito Mussolini as & Antonio Gramsci’s definition as they were the 2 Italian socialists who invented the ideology known as fascism! Mussolini was the publishing editor of A anti the largest circulating socialist newspaper in Italy & Gram sci was the party ideologies for the Italian socialist party! The idiot in question was not happy as I had University reference book titles who wrote them & when they were written as well as the Dewey decimal system number. So the silly bastard could look it up for himself if he had the intellectual curiosity to look it up himself.
. .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.