Is it a concern of the author along the lines of: "yeah, it was great fun taunting MAGA and fulfilling fever dream fantasies, but now confronted with the reality of what may happen we may have taken a bridge too far"?
Or...
A warning?
Thoughts? My only thought at the moment is that we may see a huge exodus of businesses out of New York State. Although I would love to see a response more like the Mel Gibson character from 'Ransom'......
It is more likely that President Trump will win and the judges and persecutors will be the big losers.
Let this sink in.
"Show me the man, and I'll show you the crime."
What is your crime?
Judge Anthony Wiener Pedoface is going to make his ruling in the next 1-2 days.
HOW many employees jobs are involved???
If that happens every real estate investor innNew York needs to close up shop and move to a red state because once those greedy Dems figure out they can confiscate someone’s assets like this no one is safe, even big shot Dems.
in 1948 New York had 47 electoral votes (45 representatives and two senators.
It now has 28 electoral votes (26 representatives and two senators).
After the 2030 census, it will likely have about 20-22 electoral votes.
So let them keep this shit up. New York City is returning to the cesspool it was in the 1970’s, before people like Trump made it what it was in the 1980’s.
It’ll be a city that once was, with very tall empty buildings.
While tangible assets usually make up a sizable amount of one's wealth, the social rules which allow an individual to claim them are made up by the greater society through government.
So you are only wealthy when others let you be so, meaning you have to play by the rules that those who actually run things enforce.
The cardinal sin both Trump and Musk have committed are unorthodox thought, and they are paying dearly for it.
This is a lie.
The ruling will be designed to generate headlines. Expect the worst.
How does the court have the right to do this in a private transaction where neither side of the transaction is the plaintiff? No lender that I’m aware of has filed suit against Trump. It seems to me the prosecutor, who is known to be anti-trump and ran on that platform, has the right to say: “I don’t like you so I’m taking you to court.” In what Universe is this acceptable?
I’m still trying to figure out exactly who was defrauded.
Screw the far left “democrazy”, the DOJ is the greatest danger to the American people.
Show me the crime.
There is no crime here but that perpetrated by the judge and AG.
They should be tried, not Trump.
I think he’s pointing out more of the big guys like Trump need to make sure they are properly representing their business books. Little guys couldn’t fight back and took the legal hits. Big guys could fight back. This now makes them vulnerable.
It’s not big businesses that should worry. Anyone who listed a house for more than it sold is guilty of fraudulently inflating the value of an asset.
I’m sure divorce settlements are littered with one party fraudulently inflating the value of assets to pry more money from the other party.
Car dealerships, pawn shops, flea markets, EBay, etc.
EC
Not gonna happen in a million years.
It’s the proverbial shot across the bow to anyone else thinking of running against the State. It’s their way of saying we decide who’s in the club and we decide who runs the country. Challenge that reality and this is what happens to you. Very few people can or will run against that. Good people can’t afford to have their lives and those of their families and friends destroyed like this.
If this stops Trump, fine, but it aimed at much more than just him.
Is there a guess as to the amount of the penalty the Judge Engoron will set? I am taking a guess that it will be close to a billion.
The case brought against him is itself the only fraud involved.
“And though the bank offered Trump lower interest rates because he had agreed to personally guarantee the loans with his own money, it’s not clear how much better the rates were because of the inflated figures. The bank never complained, and it’s unclear how much it lost, if anything. Bank officials called to testify couldn’t say for sure if Trump’s personal statement of worth had any impact on the rates.”
Actually, they did make it clear. They said it only required him to have $100 million of wealth, which they concluded from their own evaluation that he did.