Posted on 01/25/2024 8:02:30 AM PST by bitt
They’re thugs and goons and liars... so of course they would destroy evidence. The boys that used to protect us have gone dirty cop....
Whenever important documents like these are destroyed, it must be because the penalty for destruction of documents is much less than the penalty for what the incriminating information that the documents would have exposed. I recall this happening during the Clinton administration, especially in the Chinese funny money hearings
I think it would be reasonable to remove the presumption of innocence from government agents who destroy records in violation of law.
Similarly, if someone is convicted based on evidence claimed to exist, and then the evidence is willfully destroyed, the destroyer should get the same penalty as the guilty party, and, depending on circumstances, perhaps the convict should be set free.
They can all be locked up now right?
“failed to preserve any of its communications with the Biden White House”
The way this is worded makes it sound like it was an oversight. We known full well that it was intentional.
Definitely reasonable but it’s been a long time since anything reasonable has come out of DC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.