Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia doctor, Siavash Sobhani, who was born in US loses his CITIZENSHIP after applying for new passport
https://www.dailymail.co.uk ^ | Nov 26, 2023 | By Laura Parnaby For Dailymail.Com

Posted on 11/28/2023 7:38:54 AM PST by 11th_VA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: one guy in new jersey
If Harrison were to research U.S. statutory law to try to find the legal basis for his grandfather’s claim of U.S. citizenship, which rendered him eligible to run for and assume the office of POTUS, what would he find?

John Tyler was a citizen under the 1790 naturalization act, which, by the way, limited citizenship to whites.

61 posted on 11/28/2023 11:21:04 AM PST by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Tyler was a naturalized citizen?

Are you serious?


62 posted on 11/28/2023 12:15:02 PM PST by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
you are an idiot, that is). So, you state that Islamic Muslims are not "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States". They'll be thrilled to hear that. They can now cite you as an authority.

No, you imbecile, I am saying you cannot remain a Muslim and become a citizen of the United States of America because Muslims advocate the overthrow of the United States of America.

Try laying off the hemp before noon, next time

63 posted on 11/28/2023 12:33:25 PM PST by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey
Tyler was a naturalized citizen?

I'm just telling you what law he was a citizen under. Read the law.

64 posted on 11/28/2023 12:53:35 PM PST by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RideForever
No, you imbecile, I am saying you cannot remain a Muslim and become a citizen of the United States of America because Muslims advocate the overthrow of the United States of America.

You're the imbecile. If the individual is born in the US and subject to US laws, that individual is a citizen. The little newborn baby might "advocate the overthrow of the United States" in his little baby way, but the baby is subject to the laws and jurisdiction of the United States and is a citizen under the 14th Amendment.

65 posted on 11/28/2023 12:57:15 PM PST by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

yikes


66 posted on 11/28/2023 1:02:29 PM PST by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

"Siavash Sobhani became stateless when he tried to renew his passport in June this year - with officials telling him that he never should have been granted American citizenship in 1960, according to the Washington Post."

So, firstly, his family was here at the Shah's bequest, de facto a guest of The Company. That's not exactly "diplomatic relations" with a neutral or foreign country. That is someone as a "military student" that was expected to serve US interests back in Iran.

Secondly, mistake-in-law can lay secondary to mistake-in-fact, where he was granted citizenship, a SSN, he's paid taxes, and made exponentially more of himself than non-citizen grifters with fake (or stolen) SSNs who have never paid taxes but have taken taxpayer money ... the solution is simple, he takes the citizenship test at the front of the line. Problem solved.

67 posted on 11/28/2023 1:07:41 PM PST by StAnDeliver (TrumpII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
If the individual is born in the US and subject to US laws, that individual is a citizen. ...
the baby is subject to the laws and jurisdiction of the United States and is a citizen under the 14th Amendment.

First off, whether you're born or visiting, you are subject to our laws while here, unless you are a diplomat with credentials. But it doesn't make them a citizen of the U.S.

Here's a link to Justia about this exception for sedition -

link

68 posted on 11/28/2023 1:26:47 PM PST by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

A diplomat is NOT subject to US laws, hence “diplomatic immunity”.


69 posted on 11/28/2023 1:37:57 PM PST by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson