Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Australia has decided that it isn't totalitarian enough and is moving to lock down the internet to finally achieve freedom from dissenting speech. Once this is achieved utopia will undoubtedly follow. Some examples of what will be illegal misinformation according to the Australian government:

Type of harmExample of serious harm
Hatred against a group in Australian society on the basis of ethnicity, nationality, race, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion or physical or mental disabilityMisinformation about a group of Australians inciting other persons to commit hate crimes against that group
Disruption of public order or society in AustraliaMisinformation that encouraged or caused people to vandalise critical communications infrastructure
Harm to the integrity of Australian democratic processes or of Commonwealth, State, Territory or local government institutionsMisinformation undermining the impartiality of an Australian electoral management body ahead of an election or a referendum
Harm to the health of AustraliansMisinformation that caused people to ingest or inject bleach products to treat a viral infection
Harm to the Australian environmentMisinformation about water saving measures during a prolonged drought period in a major town or city
Economic or financial harm to Australians, the Australian economy or a sector of the Australian economyDisinformation by a foreign actor targeting local producers in favour of imported goods

Most opposition political speech can be categorized as banned misinformation under one or more of these categories, and content platforms will be required to proactively scrub it from the internet before it has a chance to cause a serious harm. "Men aren't women", "the mandatory injection doesn't doesn't stop you getting covid", and "I'm just not sure about those government vote counters..." will all have to go. The government and government-approved MSM outlets (but not independent media outlets) will be exempt.

1 posted on 06/27/2023 5:01:28 AM PDT by fluorescence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: fluorescence

So, when it is demonstrated that the program was wrong on the decision as to what was disinformation will they not only refund the fines but pay a fine to all who were wrongly accused?

And when the government puts out disinformation will everyone who was affected by it, or otherwise subjected to it, be paid a fine?


30 posted on 06/28/2023 7:16:00 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

Is it a hate crime to falsely accuse someone of having advocated, “Misinformation that caused people to ingest or inject bleach products to treat a viral infection”?

Sounds like one to me.


31 posted on 06/28/2023 7:20:02 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson