Skip to comments.
Jennifer Granholm vows an all-electric military vehicle by 2030
American Thinker ^
| 04/28/2023
| Monica Showalter
Posted on 04/28/2023 7:17:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 last
To: Trueblackman
EMP is produced by a very high altitude nuclear burst, which has little affect otherwise. No thickness of shielding helps with a close hit by a nuke. Tactical nukes will be a more effective battlefield choice than EMP.
81
posted on
04/28/2023 11:05:40 AM PDT
by
GingisK
To: skeeter
It was supposed to be powered by the same engine used in a Type VII U-boat.
82
posted on
04/28/2023 11:07:17 AM PDT
by
GingisK
To: SeekAndFind
Jennifer Granholm is an unqualified idiot with no concept of what a military is supposed to be able to do. Then again the entire upper eschelon of the Pentagon has no clue either.
83
posted on
04/28/2023 11:11:28 AM PDT
by
Scottie2000
(pentagon, Jennifer Granholm,)
To: cotton1706
Electricity doesn’t just come out of the air. And you can’t take it with you to war, unless you bring generators, which have to be run by SOMETHING. You're ignoring the obvious. Solar panels, lots of them covering our tanks. Electricity out of the air. Only thing is, ask the enemy to hold off attacking for the 3 or 4 days to charge up the tank to move 5 miles.
84
posted on
04/28/2023 11:21:24 AM PDT
by
roadcat
To: SeekAndFind
This woman needs a shrink.
To: SeekAndFind
Lots of charging stations out there in the wilderness.....
what a f@#king moron. How about choppers, missles, jets, tanks... going electric... can you imagine just the weight of the batteries...
How can this idiot be in charge of a lemonade stand????
86
posted on
04/29/2023 7:18:32 AM PDT
by
Dick Vomer
(2 Timothy 4:7 "deo duce ferro comitantes" <p><b><i></I></B><P> <img src=""> )
To: SeekAndFind
... And a mulvaney militia providing manpower for their operation for the safety and security of America.
It all makes grand sense to the dems.
87
posted on
04/29/2023 12:34:02 PM PDT
by
himno hero
(had'nff)
To: GingisK
That is what I was talking about and remember the Soviets developed low yield suitcase nukes in the 60s and 70s.
88
posted on
04/29/2023 8:24:29 PM PDT
by
Trueblackman
(I would rather stick my head up my a** & walk down an Interstate off ramp than believe Biden.)
To: SeekAndFind
This woman is either incredibly stupid or incredibly evil.
I vote "BOTH".
89
posted on
04/29/2023 9:27:07 PM PDT
by
Gritty
(The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution. - Saul Alinsky)
To: Trueblackman
They did indeed develop those. On the other hand, tactical nukes that be fired from artillery are old hat now. The Russian commanders are allowed to use them if they have them. Our guys can use them only through special permission. The Russians have a lot of artillery, it is their weapon of choice.
Tactical nukes don't cause EMP. Only high altitude bursts do that.
90
posted on
04/30/2023 5:29:35 AM PDT
by
GingisK
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson