Posted on 03/26/2023 6:55:59 AM PDT by george76
I have never used police, fire or public schools, and would argue that society as a whole benefits from social security by not having homeless and destitute elderly people, just as society benefits from police, fire, public schools and NASA, even if they don’t use them personally.
We aren’t. We do not get near that, but my husband had to take SS at early.
I was wondering the point of this also...
read it a couple of times and I’m guessing the point is in the last paragraph.
They probably would have gotten a bigger wow if they said how much total went out for the month. Or for each payment cycle in the month.
that 85% is an “up to” dollar amount based on earings
https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/taxes.html
Pres. OBama and Congress closed a Bill Clinton signed SS filing scheme.
It still exists for peole born prior to 01/02/1954.
It works best if both spouse are near FRA(full retirement age)
One spouse files for full benefits, the other spouse files a restricted claim.
The restricted claim spouse gets to put their own SS on hold. ( It incurs an additional 8 % a year increase for every year it’s on hold to age 70 - there is no further increase at 70 and later).
Once the restricted spouse turns 70, they can file for benefits under their own SSN.
https://www.thebalancemoney.com/social-security-rules-for-restricted-applications-2388915
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.