Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/05/2023 9:32:15 AM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: grundle

Do not do business with any one, any company, any entity residing in California.


38 posted on 01/05/2023 10:23:52 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Just driving more commerce from the state so it can go pure narco state with illegal weed grows.

This sounds like something an x Baltimore mob boss daughter dreamed up to skim off of.


39 posted on 01/05/2023 10:25:38 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

“The Office of Tax Appeals agreed with the Franchise Tax Board.”

-fJRoberts-


42 posted on 01/05/2023 10:30:32 AM PST by A strike ("The worse, the better."-.Lenin (& Schwab & Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle; All
"California Is Taxing Nonresidents Who Never Even Visited — Really"

To begin with, if California wants more revenue, it can lead all the states to put a stop to unconstitutional federal taxes, taxes that Congress cannot reasonably justify under its constitutional, Article I, Section 8-limited powers and a few other constitutionally enumerated expenses.

"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

Next, without knowing more about this case, the Supreme Court needs to look at this case for the following reasons imo.

Not only does Blair S. Bindley not have a vote with how California taxes are spent, but the 11th Amendment prohibits Bindley from suing California.

"11th Amendment: The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State."

So the problem is taxation without representation imo, actually a common problem these days.

44 posted on 01/05/2023 10:36:17 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Newsome wishes they all could be California serfs.


46 posted on 01/05/2023 10:47:56 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

They came after me three years after I left.
It was easier to send them $400 and be done with them


48 posted on 01/05/2023 10:53:56 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Years ago, before I fled California, I used to purchase cigarettes from an Indian run entity out of state. California tried to tax my purchase. I found methods to get around them.


56 posted on 01/05/2023 11:08:50 AM PST by Pirate Ragnar (Be calm and act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Rush refused to travel to NY because they argued he was working & subject to taxation.


58 posted on 01/05/2023 11:10:51 AM PST by Mean Daddy (Every time Hillary lies, a demon gets its wings. - Windflier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Back in the early 70’s I was in the Navy having enlisted in Pennsylvania. My folks moved to Wisconsin and I changed their address in my Navy records. I never even visited Wisconsin. After tax filing season I got a letter from Wisconsin demanding I pay them a couple hundred bucks for income tax since my parents lived there. I went to base legal who told me to throw the letter in the trash - which I did. Wisconsin sued, and won a default judgement, then tried to take part of my pay. Again legal got involved, sent a couple letters and the whole affair went away. My folks moved back to PA after about a year so their address changed again. To this day I have not been in Wisconsin!


59 posted on 01/05/2023 11:13:44 AM PST by msrngtp2002 (Just my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

A part of our income is derived from an out-of-state LLC which is half owned by our S-Corp. We pay state taxes for that portion of our income to that state, and that income is deducted from our tax liability in our home state.

It usually depends on whether or not you have a nexus in that state.


62 posted on 01/05/2023 11:41:11 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

I moved to Georgia while still an employee of a Massachusetts based company. I worked remotely for about 10 years before retiring. Since I had become a legal resident of Georgia I only paid income tax to the state of Georgia. How does California get away with this crap?


68 posted on 01/05/2023 12:57:54 PM PST by SubVet72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

“The California Franchise Tax Board matched income records showing that he collected $40,000 of income from California companies.”

So Arizona would have to subtract that amount for his state income calculations.

Can you imagine the tax nightmare for an online business selling to every state?


73 posted on 01/05/2023 1:06:59 PM PST by CottonBall (“Fascism should be called corporatism because it is a merger of state & corporate power" - Mussolini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

My answer to California, “GFYS!!”


75 posted on 01/05/2023 1:43:07 PM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dreams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson