Posted on 12/03/2022 4:59:47 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Edited on 12/03/2022 7:07:49 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
The point he was trying to make is that when the Constitution protects those who unlawfully steal elections, righting the wrong and installing the people’s choice as winner is more important than adhering to the constitution which enabled their theft.
For if the people are robbed of their choice by fraud, then the constitution is no longer protecting the peoples sacred rights, but instead is being perverted to protect the thieves who seek to subvert the will of the people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.