Then why is it the headline of the article?
The soviet-style show trial is a massive bust, the article begrudgingly acknowledges.
Here’s the short version, Liz Cheney will say she thinks everyone should hate Trump like her, the Dems will agree, and that’s a wrap.
“the ex-President is a clear and present danger to free elections. “
The only danger to our republic is voter fraud by those that count the votes.
Mailing ballots to every home in America with no way of verifying if the vote was cast by a citizen (dead or alive) or if they were allowed to vote.
The Democrats demand photo ID to do almost anything today except to vote! Now that is the real danger.
“Voters may care more about the cost of French fries than January 6 panel’s compelling evidence”
It’s my understanding that Putin ORDERED that the price of french fries be increased, so the companies complied and increased the price.
No CNN, you dolts. Natural gas, fuel and electricity. Those affect the prices of everything else.
“Compelling evidence.” Bwahahahahahaha
That statement is so ludicrous I cannot continue.
a)
b) It's a republic, you commie bastards !
Compelling evidence of nothing.
Compelling evidence — with no rebuttal by Republicans allowed?
Well, expensive fries are a fact. So, yeah.
“... – a far more visceral issue in daily life than the threat to American democracy –...?
No, the majority of people don’t see a 3 hour riot, as opposed to almost 1,000 riots, as a threat to democracy, nor do they see opinions that differ from the Biden regime as a threat to democracy.
The kool-aide is strong at CNN. A kangaroo court's evidence often looks compelling. It is only compelling when there is no credible defense, opposing arguments, rebuttal.
They like to abuse the term "compelling evidence", just like "debunked" and "baseless".
I love eating my french fries. It may be unhealthy, but at least I get some enjoyment from eating them. The sham hearing? A huge waste of precious taxpayer money whose sole purpose is to help democrats distract the public from actual issues and try and prevent Trump from running again.
The show trial will end with a sigh for its lack of hard evidence, congressional procedure, bipartisanship and a cross examination.
History will give the panel the sideward glance of a mean high school girl.
President is a clear and present danger to free elections.
Yes Biden by the millions of illegals may already have their name on ballots and sent around the country.
Liz cheneys humiliating defeat is proof positive the j6 doings are a sham.
“compelling evidence”...LOL
CNN and the MSM would know this if they ever bothered to talk to Americans.
What “compelling evidence”? Inference, innuendo, fabrications and implication is not evidence.
“Defend our democracy” has become an open admission that the writer can’t get any more specific because not only is there no evidence, there was no crime in the first place. The members of this farce were attempting to fabricate another Watergate out of thin air and can’t believe it has failed.