Posted on 06/27/2022 5:27:22 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Thanks for posting this:
Same sex marriage should be a cakewalk.
It was never passed by congress, it was decided in a liberal court in one state.
So how can it be federal law? Marriage licenses are given by States, send it back to them.
Overturn ALL laws deemed into place by judicial fiat.
“ So, what happens to a gay couple who were married in California and decided to move to a Red State that does not recognize gay marriage?”
In the Red state they are an unmarried couple. Which isn’t a problem for a normal couples because all states recognize a 1 man 1 woman marriage.
“Same sex marriage”
Shouldn’t legitimize it by calling it marriage. A homosexual role playing fantasy is what it is.
Interracial marriage of a man and a woman, unlike gay mirage is an actual marriage. The only difference is the amount of melanin in the participants. Pretending that Larry and Harry can have an actual marriage is to deny reality.
The reason i’m would think is that griswald started the penumbra and emanations as the guiding principles of SCOTUS legislation which would intervene into states legislative prcesses. It is not preventing contraception but the process that SCOTUS is using to write law. Same with the redefinition of marriage. I would like a comment from Thomas on Glenshaw Glass which redefined income allow direct taxes by the fed on anything that moves without the requirement to be apportioned among the states. That decision made wages and various exchanges as income. Thus outside the apportionment requirement.
Even from Epic Times we get the false headline that Thomas is against gay marriage, contraception and for miscegenation laws.
``````````````````````````````````
To the Epic Times:
Why would the honorable Clarence Thomas, who is married to a white woman, be for miscegenation laws?
I’m in the dark. What was the ruling about contraception about?
Contraception is against conception.
Whether or not contraception is legal.
You've seen Mrs. Thomas, right?
Then they aren't considered married and can't take advantage of any legal protections that marriage provides. Pretty clear.
I guess that depends on who defines what an actual marriage is, wouldn't it?
Hear, hear.
The Rule by Judicial Fiat needs to end. Instead of the hard work of reform and repeal of laws outdated by cultural mores of the current times, the misuse of appellant courts has been terrible.
Since the 1990s I’ve held that the Left is the modern reactionary, clinging to outdated beliefs, shrieking at any challenge to its dogma, and doubling down on everything wrong it ever inflicted upon the politic.
But I never imagined it’d go on this long, and by all reason it could only have so endured with the complicity of a willing opposition, aka the “moderate” Right.
“Same sex marriage”
Shouldn’t legitimize it by calling it marriage. A homosexual role playing fantasy is what it is.
Homosexuals role playing husband and wife are living in fantasies, not marriages nor reality!
What they like is compulsory. What they dislike is banned!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.