Posted on 03/26/2022 6:26:31 PM PDT by Mount Athos
then i expect 150% turnout...
That’s not an election.
It’s fraud.
As if faking a witness signature is any harder than faking a voter signature....
Especially when they know it isn’t going to be verified.
God these people are stupid to think we are all stupid enough to accept such an ‘explanation’.
As I understand it, Nevada didn’t do it quite that way in 2020. They scanned the signatures electronically and allowed a 40% error rate at first. When that was rejecting too many ballots, they bumped up the allowable error.
Unless they can confirm EVERY vote, it's a fraud.
Apparently, Putin has already taken back Alaska, who knew?
Long before the advent of computers, ballot stuffing and other forms of voter fraud has existed. There's always been systems to beat the systems, which is why its important to stay ahead of the fraudsters as much as possible.
They’re going to use this to steal Alaska from Republicans and Trump now? We need to ban mail-in ballot elections.
Here’s how to promote less than zero faith in election results.
I think that’s part of their plan ...
You can’t tell me there was MASSIVE percentage of fraud in the old days.
Since the gripes about Bush in 2000 the commies have been adding every method they can to increase the chances they can win and that includes fraud. The computer voting was asking for trouble…and now we’re getting away from that, shockingly.
But it also undermines the principles of election honor in itself. Why should people be able to vote endlessly before an actual DAY? What if they are dead on ACTUAL Election Day? Why should those that died get a say?
Probably. Lots of liberals agendas helped by doing this.
The GOPee candidate will win, even if he doesn’t have a plurality of honest votes. Bank on it.
When this nation began, people had to WALK MILES to get a vote, on a single day.
This lazy pandering BS has to stop. You KNOW when the damn day is, far In Advance, you can arrange to get your lazy butt out at the right time.
Along with that one day meant every person who voted was ALIVE, not dead after they voted 3 months prior.
Generically speaking, you're mostly correct. Early voting has its place as long as identification is provided during the early voting process and there is more than one witness to the validation of the identification.
Not ironically, before my first son was born in 1996 my now ex wife and I voted early because we knew if she didn't give birth by a specific date, the obstetrician had scheduled inducement on ... ELECTION DAY!
Village Clerk asked for ID which we provided and was also confirmed by a second party in the Village Clerks office. We also had to provide the reason we were early voting which happened to be readily apparent!
This bullshit around early voting (and voting early often by the looks of what happened last election) needs to be stopped period. Early voting itself however, does have a legitimate, proper place. The problem is it's been corrupted and it needs to be fixed. Fixed and LIMITED in application.
I think you may be talking about “absentee”. Those could be considered early AND mail-in. Also “provisional” (don’t get me going on that as I was forced to when they didn’t change my polling place when I moved).
I think you may be right! My bad!
Sounds like the commie RATS got this one in the bag. I wonder why they are so afraid to verify VOTER SIGNATURES. Maybe a fraudulent, fake election is needed so the commies can “turn Alaska blue”.
Not true. The Alaska house is split, with too many RINO’s. The rest of them are too cowardly to really do anything conservative.
Fix the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.