Posted on 06/12/2021 5:11:50 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Thanks
The DOJ has morphed onto the DOI ... Department of Injustice
Thank the Gop rhinos for this DEMON .
The AZ AG said he would arrest Garland if he tried to interfere with the audit.
Justice Department will review restrictive GOP voting laws
—
Not allowing the dead to vote is “restrictive”.
"Congress’s authority to regulate a particular type of election may vary depending on whether that election is for the Presidency, the House, the Senate, or for state and local positions. Further, there may be variations in what aspects of elections are amenable to regulation. Consequently, evaluating Congress’s authority to establish election procedures requires an examination of a variety of different proposals and scenarios.
Although the Constitution is silent on various aspects of the voting process, it seems to anticipate that states would be primarily responsible for establishing election procedures. Federal authority to regulate federal elections, however, is specifically provided for in the Constitution. There are two main provisions at issue—Article I, Section 4, cl. 1, which provides Congress the authority to set the “Times, Places and Manner” of congressional elections, and Article II, Section 1, cl. 4, which provides that Congress may designate the “Time” for the choosing of Presidential Electors.
Congress’s power is broadest in the case of House elections, which have historically always been decided by a system of popular voting. Congressional power over Senate elections, while almost as broad as it is for House elections, contains one textual exception—that Congress may not regulate “the Places of chusing Senators.” On the other hand, the power of Congress to regulate presidential elections is not as clearly established as the power over House and Senate elections. As noted above, the text of the Constitution provides Congress only the limited power to designate the “Time” of the choosing of Presidential Electors. It does appear that Congress’s regulatory authority over presidential elections is more extensive than might appear based on the text of Article II, Section 1, cl. 4. How much more extensive, however, remains unclear.
https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL30747.html
Evidence of corruption at every level of the Federal government..
This is what happens when you don’t have an opposition party. The GOP had FOUR YEARS to “scrutinize” criminal Democrats. What did they do? NOTHING.
If these creeps screw with the voting system as they did in the last election, the country will and should explode
Yes. But now he put him in the already corrupt DOJ and SCOTUS is no better.
Peking g Mitch McChina helped create this mess - FOR YEARS
It's mentioned in the 15th, 24th, and 26th Amendments.
As a postulate... let’s say you could go back in time to fix this. What would you have done? How can we get others to see that if we don’t fix the court system we’re headed for Civil War 2?
true
Reality 101: We are currently in CW2.
Since one cannot go back in history, ONLY actions NOW can save America...
...and appears the ONLY remaining solution is the 2A.
Got to put their seal of approval on the steal.
If this AG thinks he can interfere in how states run their elections, it needs to be pointed to the constitution (not that that matters to him).
How can you get others to see this supposed reality 101?
All that bloviating is meaningless if there isn’t real action attached to it.
He could be a bitter, vindictive man because he didn’t get to be on the Supreme Court. Now he is getting his revenge. Just what we need in the Justice Department. :(
We all got frustrated when the courts all punted the election disputes back to the state legislatures.
Turns out they were doing us a favor. Now Mr Garland’s authority is limited to ordering a sandwich for lunch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.