Covid-19: Delhi hospitals run out of oxygen supplies

BBC ^ | 04/22/2021 | Staff Writer

[ransomnote]

Please point out where I have supported Fauci, and you give a lot of volume without a lot of response wo what is actually on the topic here. I never said FR posts that I dont like, I point our FR posts that are inaccurate. I have little emotional investment beside refuting bad evidence.

And the evidence is this. Ivermectin which I have said all along is at best a partial treatment was the savior in India. Certain Freepers strutted around stating India proved the point of the big Pharma conspiracy to keep “cheap cures” from being utilized in America. People have even gone as far to say but India is too big and IVermectin is not everywhere. But now that India is embroiled in a major crises, people are going to increasingly offer strange explanations for the simple — if Ivermectin were the be all and end all, we would not hav between a quarter and a third of a million cases in India a day and getting worse.

And there is really no way around that.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“strutted around” Are you sure you don’t have any emotional involvement here? ‘How DARE FReepers disagree with YOU, a GAS DOCTOR.’ *slams fist on table impersonating royal rage*

There’s an extant body of research proving that if given early, Ivermectin is highly effective. China can attack any number of countries with other biowarfare agents but it doesn’t remove extant results. It’s just that you ‘n MSM will only talk about information that helps your side tilt the playing field.

Are you aware that China is at war with India, has an arsenal of biowarfare weapons including varients of Covid-19, and that there’s an extant body of research showing Ivermectin works well and any number of China’s attacks and MSM spin can’t erase it?

People are buying, using, and reporting positive results with Ivermectin, and there’s no way around that, MSM spin or not.

What’s particularly cruel, is that Fauci, FDA, CDC made sure the dying couldn’t even try Ivermectin. Not even a right to try.

[Cathi]

Quit embarrassing yourself. The post clearly states the email is from a physician and he did not calculate the numbers at all. The NEJM did....all laid out in a clear graph on page 27 if the Supplemental Appendix.

Try actually reading the data before you try to wave your credentials around. It just makes you look incompetent.

[Captain Peter Blood]

This is what is sold in India for COVID-19 treatment.

[Chode]

if India has these kind of numbers, i wonder what the REAL chin numbers are?

[Mom MD]

you are the one embarrassing yourself. it has been posted many times about covid alone on a death certificate. It is quite rare to have just one cause of death listed - in fact almost never You wish to continue to propagate the falsehood go ahead

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Treatment and prophylaxis. I thought the widespread sale of the kits and the use of HCQ had kept the contagion under control in India.

[Fury]

A reminder to FReepers to keep on point, and to not make it personal.

Posters from all sides of the issue need to accept that FReepers may look at the issue differently and make a different decision. Getting triggered over someone not doing the same as you is unfortunate and we are better than that.

[BlackAdderess]

Thats exactly what I was thinking, Trump would have helped these guys out

[bagster]

Try actually reading the data before you try to wave your credentials around. It just makes you look incompetent.

p.s. I like you Cathi. You're one sharp cookie.

[Cathi]

You really do have a reading disorder. I repeat again since comprehension obviously isn’t your strong suite. I didn’t read the death certificates, the physician didn’t read the death certificates.

The NEJM did the study. And let’s face it they have more impressive “credentials” than you...:-)

The fact that for the second time you were incapable of clicking on a link, turning to page 27 and seeing the data for yourself pretty much says everything anyone needs to know about your abilities.

[heavy metal]

open the windows... 😁

[ransomnote]

Cathi to ransomnote

Yes, I concur about the breakthrough cases situation. This is what I posted a few hrs. ago along with the latest study of two “breakthrough” vaccinated woman with full blown covid cases with strong vax response, high covid titres and a high viral load.

I wonder how many people realize what she (CDC Director) (and Fauci) really told you. They now know that the vax will not provide the hoped for level of efficacy against becoming infected with and/or transmission of covid.

So they are insisting on maintaining the restrictions they advised before there was a vax.

Dr. Risch: “The vaccination, because it only cuts transmission by 50 to 60% and not by 90%, it’s not that strong to shut off the infection so, yes it is adding to herd immunity but it’s not enough to bring it down fast and that’s the reason why Dr. Fauci is still espousing distancing and mask wearing and so on because he is trying to say we need more than just the 50 to 60% benefit in order to bring the infections down more quickly.”

Dr. Risch: Clinicians I talk to now say that over 50% of the covid patients they are seeing have been vaccinated.

CDC: “In the coming weeks, CDC will transition this surveillance activity to focus on identifying and investigating only those vaccine breakthrough infections that result in hospitalization or death. This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I believe the 60% efficacy is faked by increasing the criteria for a Covid-19 diagnoses. The PCR has a 90% false positive rate and those who aren't ill are being described as "asymptomatic". Reduce the number of healthy people described as a covid case and Voila! They claim the vaccine works!

By design, the 'vaccines' can't really prevent infection. There is no preventive mechanism. The manufacturers/Fauci claim they work once infection occurs, that's why key data is 'unavailable' from the vaccine companies:

Pfizer and Moderna stated in their filings that they have gaps in their data. Specifically, the vaccine companies said they have:

• No data on transmission of covid

• No data on preventing mortality from covid

• No data on duration of protection from covid

That's why the CDC reworded it's definition of "vaccine" to include a mush of words meaning 'helps protect you" because their traditional definition up until March said, 'prevents infection."

As you can see by clicking the CDC link, the definition of vaccine has changed to fit the 'narrative'.

On 3/4/2021, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) gave the definition of the term vaccine on its website: A vaccine is a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease. Immunity is the protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm

After the vaccines began administration, Fauci lied and said, "We're seeing evidence that they DO prevent infection." but he was referring to observations, not 2 months of lab data. They don't know what happens after 2 months in the lab except the numbers they create for us. And I believe their lab resutls have to be false because the method of measuring a Covid-19 diagnosis is invalid.

Here’s why mRNA injections do not meet the legal definition of ‘vaccine’ – LeoHohmann.com

Italian Researchers: Vaccines Will Not Work Because SARS-CoV-2 Is Also Entering Bacteria (freerepublic.com)

[Stentor]

Our first world medical system is being decimated by the ignorant expertise of the acolytes of Dr. Google and people who cut and paste bullet points with no depth of understanding.

Oh! The drama!

[bagster]

A reminder to FReepers to keep on point, and to not make it personal. Posters from all sides of the issue need to accept that FReepers may look at the issue differently and make a different decision. Getting triggered over someone not doing the same as you is unfortunate and we are better than that.

Furry, did you forget something in your thread nanny post?

What about 'signal to noise ratio'?

[Glad2bnuts]

As do I. The first rule in news stories to me is, find out if they are lying.

I have never seen such blatant lying by Big media since 2016 since Pravda and Ivestia.

[Flick Lives]

Only 544 people caught the virus 7 or more days after getting their second dose of the vaccine, so 93% percent effectiveness.

—

That is assuming 100% exposure of the vaccinated population to Covid. How does the infection rate in vaccinated compare with the infection rate in non-vaccinated?

[gas_dr]

The virus is endemic, we can likely assume exposure is universal

[gas_dr]

You...are...an...idiot. Her credentials are quite superior.

[gas_dr]

I would really enjoy hearing your credentials on the treatment of CoVID and your background in medical education beyond cut and paste.